Affiliations 

  • 1 U.O.C. UTIC-Cardiologia, P.O. San Giuseppe Moscati - Aversa - ASL Caserta, Aversa, Italy
  • 2 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele-Milan, Italy
  • 3 IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milano, Italy
  • 4 Pantai Hospital Ayer Keroh, Melaka, Malaysia
  • 5 Sultanah Aminah Hospital Johor Bahru, Johor bahru, Malaysia
  • 6 ASP S. Giovanni di Dio, Agrigento, Italy
  • 7 Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Division of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
  • 8 We 4 Clinical Research, Milano, Italy. bcortese@gmail.com
Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2024 Feb 03;23(1):52.
PMID: 38310281 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-024-02139-9

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in diabetic patients are still suboptimal, and it is unclear if diabetic patients might derive a benefit from the use of drug-coated balloons.

AIMS: To evaluate the impact of diabetes mellitus on the outcomes of patients undergoing PCI with sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) MagicTouch (Concept Medical, India).

METHODS: We conducted a subgroup analysis of the prospective, multicenter, investigator-initiated EASTBOURNE registry, evaluating the performance of MagicTouch SCB in patients with and without diabetes. The study primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12-month follow-up. Secondary clinical endpoints were major adverse clinical events (MACE), death, myocardial infarction (MI), and BARC 2-5 bleedings.

RESULTS: Among 2,083 enrolled patients, a total of 864 suffered from diabetes (41.5%). Patients with diabetes had a numerically higher occurrence of TLR (6.5% vs. 4.7% HR 1.38, 95%CI 0.91-2.08), all-cause death (3.8% vs. 2.6%, HR 1.81, 95%CI 0.95-3.46), and MACE (12.2% vs. 8.9%; HR 1.26 95%CI 0.92-1.74). The incidence of spontaneous MI was significantly higher among diabetic patients (3.4% vs. 1.5%, HR 2.15 95%CI 1.09-4.25); bleeding events did not significantly differ. The overall incidence of TLR was higher among in-stent restenosis (ISR) as compared to de-novo coronary lesions, irrespectively from diabetes status.

CONCLUSIONS: In the EASTBOURNE DIABETES registry, diabetic patients treated with the MagicTouch SCB did not have a significant increase in TLR when compared to non-diabetic patients; moreover, diabetic status did not affect the study device performance in terms of TLR, in both de-novo lesions and ISR.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.