Comparison study of the MRI shoulder PROPELLER technique with differential image quality by variation of shoulder coils

INTRODUCTION: Motion and pulsation artifacts are the most prominent types of artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the shoulder. Therefore, this study examined the Periodically Rotating Overlapping Parallel Lines with Enhanced Reconstruction (PROPELLER) technique with small flex coil (SFC) and dedicated shoulder coil (DSC) for the reduction of motion and pulsation artifacts. The signalto- noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the standard proton density fat saturation (PDFS) pulse sequence and the PROPELLER proton density fat saturation (PROPELLER PDFS) pulse sequence were also evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen (18) participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were scanned using a standard non-contrast MRI shoulder protocol including the PDFS pulse sequence and the PROPELLER PDFS pulse sequence using a small flex coil and a dedicated shoulder coil. Two experienced musculoskeletal (MSK) radiologists evaluated and graded the presence of artifacts on the MR images and the SNR and CNR were measured quantitatively.

RESULTS: The non-parametric Wilcoxon Signed Rank test revealed a significant reduction in motion and pulsation artifacts between the PROPELLER PDFS pulse sequence and the standard PDFS pulse sequence. In addition, the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test revealed that the mean rank of SNR for the standard sequence was statistically significant when compared to the PROPELLER sequence for both coil types. The CNR of the PROPELLER sequence was statistically significant between fat-fluid, bone-fluid, bonetendon, bone-muscle, and muscle-fluid when using SFC and DSC.

CONCLUSION: This study proved that the PROPELLER-PDFS pulse sequence effectively eliminates motion and pulsation artifacts, regardless of the coils utilised. The PROPELLERPDFS pulse sequence can therefore be implemented into the standard MRI shoulder procedure.