Affiliations 

  • 1 Singapore Fertility and IVF Consultancy Pvt Ltd, 531A Upper Cross Street, #04-95, Hong Lim Complex, Chinatown, 051531, Singapore. boonchinheng@yahoo.com
  • 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kisangani University Hospital, Kisangani, Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • 3 Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Advanced Reproductive Centre (ARC), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. drmohdfaizal@ukm.edu.my
J Assist Reprod Genet, 2024 Jul;41(7):1727-1731.
PMID: 38695986 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03125-6

Abstract

Germline genome editing of IVF embryos is controversial because it is not directly health or lifesaving but is intended to prevent genetic diseases in yet-unborn future offspring. The following criteria are thus proposed for future clinical trials: (i) Due to medical risks, there should be cautious and judicious application while avoiding any non-essential usage, with rigorous patient counseling. (ii) Genome editing should only be performed on the entire batch of IVF embryos without initial PGT screening if all of them are expected to be affected by genetic disease. (iii) When there is a fair chance that some IVF embryos will not be affected by genetic diseases, initial PGT screening must be performed to identify unaffected embryos for transfer. (iv) IVF embryos with carrier status should not undergo germline genome editing. (v) If patients fail to conceive after the transfer of unaffected embryos, they should undergo another fresh IVF cycle rather than opt for genome editing of their remaining affected embryos. (vi) Only if the patient is unable to produce any more unaffected embryos in a fresh IVF cycle due to advanced maternal age or diminished ovarian reserves, can the genome editing of remaining affected embryos be permitted as a last resort.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.