Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Economics, Nile University of Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria
  • 2 UNITEN BUsiness School, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang 43000, Malaysia
  • 3 Department of Economics, Benue State University, Makurdi, Nigeria
  • 4 Department of Economics, Istanbul Ticaret University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 5 CREDS-Centre for Research on Digitalization and Sustainability, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Norway
Heliyon, 2024 May 15;10(9):e30138.
PMID: 38707373 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30138

Abstract

The agricultural value chain is underpinned by the interdependence of agricultural value added, household consumption and domestic investment. Understanding the complex interactions between these microeconomic outcomes and the uncertainties in the macroeconomic variables of exchange rates, energy prices and sectoral spending remains under-researched. Therefore, this study examines the impact of exchange rate, energy prices and sectoral spending on agricultural value added, household consumption and domestic investment in Nigeria from 1981 to 2020. Using Kernel regularized least squares (KRLS), the results show that the average pointwise marginal effects of exchange rate and agricultural spending are positive, while the average pointwise marginal effect of energy price is significantly negative for the agricultural value-added model. The results also show that the exchange rate, energy prices and agricultural expenditure all have a positive effect on household consumption. Regarding domestic investment, the effect of the exchange rate is positive and statistically insignificant, while the effects of energy prices and agricultural expenditure are negative and statistically significant. The study recommends the need to strengthen the social safety nets currently in place in Nigeria to support households that are vulnerable to exchange rate fluctuations. In addition, incentives should be given to households and farmers to help use renewable energy sources such as solar or wind power for agricultural activities. Also, investment in value chains and agribusiness initiatives should be encouraged rather than just in crop production.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.