Affiliations 

  • 1 Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Ecuador. Electronic address: manuelzambranom@uees.edu.ec
  • 2 Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia
  • 3 Prince Mohammad Bin Fahad University Saudi Arabia Khobar, College of Business Administration, Department of Management and Marketing, Saudi Arabia
  • 4 International Institute of Social Studies (ISS), Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Hague, the Netherlands; National Higher School of Statistics and Applied Economics (ENSSEA), Koléa, Algeria
  • 5 Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Science, Cyprus International University, Nicosia, Northern Cyprus, TR-10, Mersin, Turkey; Research Center of Development Economics, Azerbaijan State University of Economics (UNEC), Baku, Azerbaijan
Environ Pollut, 2024 Dec 01;362:124940.
PMID: 39265769 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124940

Abstract

This paper analyzes the dynamic impact of economic, social, and governance factors on PM2.5 concentrations in 89 countries from 2006 to 2019. Using the GMM-PVAR approach and Impulse-Response Functions, we examine how shocks to specific variables affect PM2.5 concentrations over a 10-year period. Our findings reveal that the influence of these factors on PM2.5 levels varies over time. For example, a shock in urbanization has no effect on PM2.5 concentrations in the first year, but in the second year, pollution increases significantly. In the third period, PM2.5 levels decrease, but they rise again in the fourth period, albeit not significantly. By the fifth period, pollution decreases until a new equilibrium is reached in the sixth period. Additionally, a shock in financial development, government effectiveness, industrialization, trade openness, or GDP has no effect on PM2.5 concentrations in the initial period. However, during the second period, air pollution decreases, followed by an increase in the third period and a decrease again in the fourth period. These dynamic patterns highlight the need for environmental policies that consider the evaluation time horizon. Our analysis is supplemented by the Granger causality test, guiding specific policy recommendations based on our findings.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.