Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Surgery, Alexandra Hospital (NUHS), Queenstown, Singapore
  • 2 Department of General Surgery, Fortis Memorial Research Institute, Gurugram, Haryana, India
  • 3 Department of Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
  • 4 Department of Surgery, Chungnam National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • 5 Department of Laparoscopic, Thoracoscopic and Bariatric Surgery, Viveka Hospitals and Research Centre, Nagpur, India
  • 6 Department of General Surgery, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Yishun, Singapore
  • 7 Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • 8 Department of GI Surgery, Viet Duc University Hospital, Ha Noi, Vietnam
  • 9 Department of Surgery, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia
  • 10 Department of General Surgery, Pantai Hospital, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 11 Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic-Assisted Surgery, Prince of Songkla University Hospital, Songkhla, Thailand
  • 12 Department of Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand
  • 13 Department of Surgery, Chonburi Hospital, Chonburi, Thailand
Asian J Endosc Surg, 2026;19(1):e70255.
PMID: 41655995 DOI: 10.1111/ases.70255

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The global burden of inguinal hernia (IH) has significantly increased. Mesh with self-fixating technology helps provide superior tissue integration, reducing the need for additional fixation compared to conventional mesh. Benefits include shorter operative time, reduced hospital stay, lower recurrence rates, and improved quality of life. However, variability remains in its adoption and application. To address this, a panel of Asian hernia experts convened to develop a consensus and formulate recommendations on self-fixating mesh (SFM) use in IH repair.

METHOD: A panel of 13 hernia experts participated in the consensus discussion and manuscript development. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar to identify relevant articles and formulate statements. Consensus was assessed using a modified three-step Delphi method, with an acceptance level of > 80%.

RESULTS: In phase 1 of consensus development, 11 statements were reviewed, with 9 reaching consensus and 1 facing disagreement. Five additional statements were introduced based on expert input. Phase 2 reviewed all 16 statements, with one failing to reach consensus. In phase 3, an online reassessment of the revised version of the failed statement in the previous round was conducted via Microsoft Forms, leading to consensus on all 16 statements.

CONCLUSION: SFM offers significant advantages over conventional sutured meshes in IH repair. However, further research and multicenter trials are recommended to refine surgical protocols. Based on expert recommendations, SFM may be preferred in IH repair, and structured training can enhance its adoption, improving patient outcomes.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.