Affiliations 

  • 1 Psychology, School of Science, University of Buckingham, Buckingham, United Kingdom
  • 2 Department of Psychology, School of Science and Technology, Sunway University, Selangor, Malaysia
  • 3 Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom
Front Psychol, 2017;8:1798.
PMID: 29081761 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01798

Abstract

Rhythmically coordinating with a partner can increase pro-sociality, but pro-sociality does not appear to change in proportion to coordination success, or particular classes of coordination. Pro-social benefits may have more to do with simply coordinating in a social context than the details of the actual coordination (Cross et al., 2016). This begs the question, how stripped down can a coordination task be and still affect pro-sociality? Would it be sufficient simply to imagine coordinating with others? Imagining a social interaction can lead to many of the same effects as actual interaction (Crisp and Turner, 2009). We report the first experiments to explore whether imagined coordination affects pro-sociality similarly to actual coordination. Across two experiments and over 450 participants, mentally simulated coordination is shown to promote some, but not all, of the pro-social consequences of actual coordination. Imagined coordination significantly increased group cohesion and de-individuation, but did not consistently affect cooperation.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.