Affiliations 

  • 1 Universiti Sains Malaysia
MyJurnal

Abstract

Assessment of medical professionalism is often challenged by the subjectivity of its construct and
lack of feedback practice to nurture professional growth. However transmitting professionalism alone
has not been shown to improve professional behaviour therefore professionalism need to be assessed
if it is viewed as relevant. The authors provided description and guidelines on the use of Simplified
Thematic Engagement of Professionalism Scale (STEPS) as summative and formative assessment
tool for assessing professionalism attributes. STEPS was developed based on the Professionalism
Mini-Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) format that utilise multiple short encounter assessment and
incorporated professionalism values from a local study. The formative component has 15 attributes
that were categorised into personal, profession, patient and public. This is assessed using seven scale
rubric that promotes feedback practice using feed up, feed back and feed forward concept. The
summative component utilises global rating that will be collated longitudinally to form a more robust
evaluation of student professionalism. Current investigations are ongoing especially to ascertain the
usability and validity of STEPS as peer assessment and self-assessment tool.