Affiliations 

  • 1 University of Malaya
  • 2 Queensland University of Technology
Movement Health & Exercise, 2018;7(1):143-150.
MyJurnal

Abstract

Introduction. Coaching behaviour, motivational climate and its influence
towards performance satisfaction are important in understanding the
development and growth of athletes. In general, positive coaching behaviours
could help in enhancing the motivational climate and satisfaction of athletes
while negative coaching behaviour might have the opposite effect. Therefore,
this study explored the influence of volleyball coaches’ behaviour on elite
volleyball players’ motivational climate and performance satisfaction.
Methodology. Three hundred and twenty eight elite volleyball players (137
male and 191 female, age: 24.42 ± 8.92 years old) participated in this study.
They completed three questionnaires: the Coaching Behaviour Questionnaire
(CBQ), Perceived Motivational Climate in Sport Questionnaire-2 (PMCSQ2),
and Athlete Satisfaction Questionnaire (ASQ). These questionnaires were
used to assess athletes’ perceptions of their coaches’ behaviour, to examine
the influence of athletes’ perceptions of the individual feedback received on
their perceptions of the team’s motivational climate and to measure the elite
volleyball players’ satisfaction of their team’s performance. Results &
Discussion. There was a positive relationship between motivational climate
and performance satisfaction (r=0.25); coaching behaviour and performance
satisfaction (r=0.26); motivational climate and performance satisfaction
(r=0.40). For CBQ, the mean score showed that coach support (2.97 ± 0.40)
was the most important as compared to negative coaching behaviour (2.44 ±
0.45). For ASQ, the mean score showed that team integration (5.33 ± 1.00)
was the most important subscale influencing athlete satisfaction. The lowest
rated athlete satisfaction was external agents, example, facilities and
supporters (4.56 ± 0.95). For PMCSQ-2, a higher mean was reported for taskinvolving
climate, example, cooperative learning, effort/improvement,
important role (5.36 ± 0.89) than ego-involving climate, example, intra-team
member rivalry, unequal recognition, punishment for mistakes (4.09 ± 0.95). Conclusion. Coaches should look into their own coaching behaviour because
it is a fundamental aspect in enhancing the performance of athletes with
respect to motivational climate and performance satisfaction.