Affiliations 

  • 1 College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
  • 2 College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China. Electronic address: hanyongbin@njau.edu.cn
  • 3 Kerry Global Technology and Innovation Centre, Naas, Co. Kildare W91W923, Ireland
  • 4 Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Jalan Broga, Semenyih 43500, Malaysia
  • 5 Zhihai Postgraduate Working Station, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212000, China
Ultrason Sonochem, 2019 Apr;52:193-204.
PMID: 30514598 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.11.018

Abstract

In this work, sonication (20-kHz) was conducted to assist the biosorption of phenolics from blueberry pomace extracts by brewery waste yeast biomass. The adsorption capacity of yeast increased markedly under ultrasonic fields. After sonication at 394.2 W/L and 40 °C for 120 min, the adsorption capacity was increased by 62.7% compared with that under reciprocating shaking. An artificial neural network was used to model and visualize the effects of different parameters on yeast biosorption capacity. Both biosorption time and acoustic energy density had positive influences on yeast biosorption capacity, whereas no clear influence of temperature on biosorption process was observed. Regarding the mechanism of ultrasound-enhanced biosorption process, the amino and carboxyl groups in yeast were considered to be associated with the yeast biosorption property. Meanwhile, ultrasound promoted the decline of the structure order of yeast cells induced by phenolic uptake. The interactions between yeast cells and phenolics were also affected by the structures of phenolics. Moreover, the mass transfer process was simulated by a surface diffusional model considering the ultrasound-induced yeast cell disruption. The modeling results showed that the external mass transfer coefficient in liquid phase and the surface diffusion coefficient under sonication at 394.2 W/L and 40 °C were 128.5% and 74.3% higher than that under reciprocating shaking, respectively.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Similar publications