Affiliations 

  • 1 UKM Medical Molecular Biology Institute (UMBI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia. Electronic address: hui-min@ppukm.ukm.edu.my
  • 2 Department of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Japan
  • 3 Department of Medical Microbiology & Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • 4 Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
Infect Genet Evol, 2019 10;74:103935.
PMID: 31233781 DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2019.103935

Abstract

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is considered the "gold standard" for bacteria typing. The method involves enzyme restriction of bacteria DNA, separation of the restricted DNA bands using a pulsed-field electrophoresis chamber, followed by clonal assignment of bacteria based on PFGE banding patterns. Various PFGE protocols have been developed for typing different bacteria, leading it to be one of the most widely used methods for phylogenetic studies, food safety surveillance, infection control and outbreak investigations. On the other hand, as PFGE is lengthy and labourious, several PCR-based typing methods can be used as alternatives for research purposes. Recently, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) have also been proposed for bacteria typing. In fact, as WGS provides more information, such as antimicrobial resistance and virulence of the tested bacteria in comparison to PFGE, more and more laboratories are currently transitioning from PFGE to WGS for bacteria typing. Nevertheless, PFGE will remain an affordable and relevant technique for small laboratories and hospitals in years to come.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.