Affiliations 

  • 1 Dr. Mohan's Diabetes Specialities Centre and Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. drmohans@diabetes.ind.in
  • 2 Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
  • 3 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 4 Faculty of Medicine, ABC Foundation, Santo André, Brazil
  • 5 Department of Endocrinology, University Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • 6 Shree Hindu Mandal Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
  • 7 Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • 8 Medanta-The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India
  • 9 Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal
  • 10 Department of Medicine, University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines
  • 11 Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University of Medicine 2, Yangon, Myanmar
  • 12 Department of Endocrinology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 13 Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetes, and Endocrinology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
  • 14 University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon
Diabetes Ther, 2020 Jan;11(1):15-35.
PMID: 31773420 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-019-00733-9

Abstract

With the growing prevalence of type 2 diabetes, particularly in emerging countries, its management in the context of available resources should be considered. International guidelines, while comprehensive and scientifically valid, may not be appropriate for regions such as Asia, Latin America or Africa, where epidemiology, patient phenotypes, cultural conditions and socioeconomic status are different from America and Europe. Although glycaemic control and reduction of micro- and macrovascular outcomes remain essential aspects of treatment, access and cost are major limiting factors; therefore, a pragmatic approach is required in restricted-resource settings. Newer agents, such as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in particular, are relatively expensive, with limited availability despite potentially being valuable for patients with insulin resistance and cardiovascular complications. This review makes a case for the role of more accessible second-line treatments with long-established efficacy and affordability, such as sulfonylureas, in the management of type 2 diabetes, particularly in developing or restricted-resource countries.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.