Affiliations 

  • 1 Growth and Development, Melbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia
  • 2 Oral Anatomy, Medicine and Surgery, Melbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia
  • 3 Restorative Dentistry, Melbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia
  • 4 Growth and Development, Melbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia. sadna.v@unimelb.edu.au
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 2020 Aug;21(4):519-525.
PMID: 32100200 DOI: 10.1007/s40368-020-00515-z

Abstract

AIM: Successful endodontic treatment of primary teeth requires comprehensive knowledge and understanding of root canal morphology. The purpose of this study was to investigate the root canal configurations of primary maxillary second molars using micro-computed tomography.

METHODS: Extracted human primary maxillary second molars (n = 57) were scanned using micro-computed tomography and reconstructed to produce three-dimensional models. Each root canal system was analysed qualitatively according to Vertucci's classification.

RESULTS: 22.8% (n = 13) of the sample presented with the fusion of the disto-buccal and palatal roots; of these, Type V was the most prevalent classification. For teeth with three separate roots (n = 44), the most common root canal type was Type 1 for the palatal canal (100%) and disto-buccal canal (77.3%) and Type V for the mesio-buccal canal (36.4%). Overall, 7% (n = 4) of mesio-buccal canals were 'unclassifiable'.

CONCLUSION: The root canal systems of primary maxillary second molars were not only complex but had a range of configurations that may contribute to unfavourable clinical outcomes after endodontic treatment.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.