Affiliations 

  • 1 School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan. Electronic address: chrisng@nagasaki-u.ac.jp
  • 2 School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
  • 3 School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan; Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
  • 4 Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Int J Infect Dis, 2020 Dec;101:409-411.
PMID: 33075527 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.10.027

Abstract

The first wave of COVID-19 epidemic began in late January in Malaysia and ended with a very small final size. The second wave of infections broke out in late February and grew rapidly in the first 3 weeks. Authorities in the country responded quickly with a series of control strategies collectively known as the Movement Control Order (MCO) with different levels of intensity matching the progression of the epidemic. We examined the characteristics of the second wave and discussed the key control strategies implemented in the country. In the second wave, the epidemic doubled in size every 3.8 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.3, 4.5) in the first month and decayed slowly after that with a halving time of approximately 3 weeks. The time-varying reproduction number Rt peaked at 3.1 (95% credible interval: 2.7, 3.5) in the 3rd week, declined sharply thereafter and stayed below 1 in the last 3 weeks of April, indicating low transmissibility approximately 3 weeks after the MCO. Experience of the country suggests that adaptive triggering of distancing policies combined with a population-wide movement control measure can be effective in suppressing transmission and preventing a rebound.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.