Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
  • 2 Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
  • 3 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Addiction, 2021 08;116(8):2135-2149.
PMID: 33404150 DOI: 10.1111/add.15399

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To address the widespread severe problems with opioid use disorder, buprenorphine-naloxone treatment provided by primary care physicians has greatly expanded treatment access; however, treatment is often provided with minimal or no behavioral interventions. Whether or which behavioral interventions are feasible to implement in various settings and improve treatment outcomes has not been established. This study aimed to evaluate two behavioral interventions to improve buprenorphine-naloxone treatment.

DESIGN: A 2 × 2 factorial, repeated-measures, open-label, randomized clinical trial.

SETTINGS: General medical practice offices in Muar, Malaysia.

PARTICIPANTS: Opioid-dependent individuals (n = 234).

INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to one of four treatment conditions and received study interventions for 24 weeks: (1) physician management with or without behavioral counseling and (2) physician management with or without abstinence-contingent buprenorphine-naloxone (ACB) take-home doses.

MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcomes were proportions of opioid-negative urine tests and HIV risk behaviors [assessed by audio computer-assisted AIDS risk inventory (ACASI-ARI)].

FINDINGS: The rates of opioid-negative urine tests over 24 weeks of treatment were significantly higher with [68.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 65-71] than without behavioral counseling (59.2%, 95% CI = 56-62, P 

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.