Affiliations 

  • 1 Institute for Research in Molecular Medicine (INFORMM), Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Penang, Malaysia. yeesiew@usm.my
  • 2 Institute for Research in Molecular Medicine (INFORMM), Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Penang, Malaysia
  • 3 Computational Chemistry Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Mauritius, Réduit 80837, Mauritius
  • 4 Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology & Metabolism, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom
  • 5 Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology & Metabolism, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom. reshma.ramracheya@ocdem.ox.ac.uk
  • 6 Computational Chemistry Group, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Mauritius, Réduit 80837, Mauritius. p.ramasami@uom.ac.mu
Hormones (Athens), 2021 Sep;20(3):557-569.
PMID: 33782920 DOI: 10.1007/s42000-021-00278-2

Abstract

PURPOSE: Diabetes mellitus is a common condition in the clinically obese. Bariatric surgery is one of the ways to put type 2 diabetes in remission. Recent findings propose the appetite-regulator peptide tyrosine tyrosine (PYY) as a therapeutic option for patients with type 2 diabetes. This novel gut hormone restores impaired insulin and glucagon secretion in pancreatic islets and is implicated in type 2 diabetes reversal after bariatric surgery. The current study elucidates the interactions between PYY and the NPY1R and NPY4R receptors using computational methods.

METHODS: Protein structure prediction, molecular docking simulation, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation were performed to elucidate the interactions of PYY with NPY1R and NPY4R.

RESULTS: The predicted binding models of PYY-NPY receptors are in agreement with those described in the literature, although different interaction partners are presented for the C-terminal tail of PYY. Non-polar interactions are predicted to drive the formation of the protein complex. The calculated binding energies show that PYY has higher affinity for NPY4R (ΔGGBSA = -65.08 and ΔGPBSA = -87.62 kcal/mol) than for NPY1R (ΔGGBSA = -23.11 and ΔGPBSA = -50.56 kcal/mol).

CONCLUSIONS: Based on the constructed models, the binding conformations obtained from docking and MD simulation for both the PYY-NPY1R and PYY-NPY4R complexes provide a detailed map of possible interactions. The calculated binding energies show a higher affinity of PYY for NPY4R. These findings may help to understand the mechanisms behind the improvement of diabetes following bariatric surgery.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.