Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
  • 2 School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia; Center for Global Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  • 3 Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand
  • 4 Division of Hematology and Hematological Malignancies, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
  • 5 Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia. Electronic address: nathorn.chaiyakunapruk@utah.edu
Value Health Reg Issues, 2021 Nov 17;28:7-13.
PMID: 34800834 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2021.07.003

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the budget impact of emicizumab as prophylactic therapy in reducing the frequency of bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia A with inhibitors in Malaysia.

METHODS: A budget impact model was built to assess the cost implication of introducing emicizumab for routine prophylaxis of bleeding episodes in people with hemophilia A with inhibitors. It was based on the public healthcare system in Malaysia over a 5-year duration. The primary analysis computed healthcare costs for emicizumab compared with no prophylactic regimen to calculate the budget needed to treat all patients with hemophilia A with inhibitors.

RESULTS: The introduction of emicizumab resulted in a total incremental budget of Malaysian Ringgit (RM) 20 356 897 ($4 917 125) during the first year. The total cost for the current situation (no prophylaxis) was RM13 425 941 ($3 242 981), whereas the total cost for the new situation (prophylaxis with emicizumab) was RM33 782 838 ($8 160 106). The 5-year cumulative incremental budget impact from 2021 to 2025 was RM97 205 459 ($23 479 579) with an uncertainty range from -RM4 869 886 (-$1 176 301) to RM138 035 597 ($33 341 932) and a total of 72 patients treated with emicizumab. In a sensitivity analysis, the use of emicizumab was cost saving if the annual bleeding rate was greater than 16 instead of 6 times per year.

CONCLUSION: The 5-year budget impact might be considered reasonable and possibly cost saving. The model and approach used in this study to obtain relevant parameters where scarce data exist may help other jurisdictions with future adaptation.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.