Affiliations 

  • 1 Penang International Dental College, Butterworth 12000, Penang, Malaysia
  • 2 Asian Institute of Medicine, Science and Technology University, Semeling, Bedong 08100, Kedah, Malaysia
  • 3 Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Lincoln University, Jalan Stadium SS 7/15, Ss 7, Petaling Jaya 47301, Selangor, Malaysia
  • 4 Dental Biomaterials Research Chair, Dental Health Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11433, Saudi Arabia
Materials (Basel), 2021 Nov 16;14(22).
PMID: 34832308 DOI: 10.3390/ma14226908

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Posts that have been properly fitted can withstand torsion forces and so provide better retention. The push-out bonding strength of glass fiber posts to the root canal was evaluated using resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and flowable composite (FC).

METHOD: Forty single-rooted maxillary central incisors were used in the study. The samples were randomly divided into two groups of 20 teeth each. The crown-down procedure was used to clean and shape the pulp area. A Tenax fiber trans Coltene whaletene post was used by both groups. The first group utilized FC (Filtek Z 350 3M ESPE) to coat the post, whereas the second group used RMGIC (Rely X 3M ESPE). The specimens were cross-sectioned after 24 h. Specimens were cross-sectioned four millimeters thick into coronal and middle parts using a sectioning machine, yielding 40 specimens per group. The strength of the bond between the luting cement and the posts was measured using push-out bond strength testing. We loaded the components at a cross speed of 0.5 mm/min on a universal testing machine until the bond failed.

RESULTS: The FC group had a 4.80 N push-out bond strength, whereas the RMGIC group had a 7.11 N push-out bond strength.

CONCLUSION: FC's mean push-out bond strength score is lower than RMGIC's.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.