Displaying all 2 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Mohd-Ali B, Leong SF, Abdul-Mutalib H, Mohidin N
    Clin Ter, 2011;162(4):327-30.
    PMID: 21912820
    OBJECTIVE: Asians are known to have different tear characteristics compared to Caucasians that may affect contact lens wear. There are scanty research studies that have evaluated tears during continuous wear contact lens in Asia. The present study aims to evaluate changes in tears in subjects wearing continuous wear rigid gas permeable contact lens (CWRGP) for 6 months.
    MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty five neophyte subjects (21 females, 14 females) were recruited for this study. Subjects were fitted with CWRGP lenses with Dk of 163 on both eyes. Tear was evaluated using Phenol red thread test (PRT), tear break up time (TBUT) test and tear meniscus height (TMH) measurement. Non parametric and parametric analyses were used to compare the parameters.
    RESULTS: Values at baseline (BL) and six months (6M) were as follow: PRT, BL=19.10 ± 3.86 mm, 6M= 21.02 ± 4.27 mm, TBUT, BL= 8.58 ± 4.90 sec, 6M=8.08 ± 5.32 sec, TMH, BL= 0.38 ± 0.12 mm, 6M= 0.34 ± 0.07 mm. Statistical analysis showed significant difference in tear volume for PRT only at 6 months (p=0.007).
    CONCLUSION: Our analysis showed minimal change in the tear characteristics after six months of CWRGP lens wear, which indicated low impact of CWRGP contact lens on tears characteristics of Asian eyes. However, careful monitoring is required to prevent development of adverse events during contact lens wear.
  2. Md-Muziman-Syah MM, Muzir NS, Abdul Mutalib H, Ab Halim N
    BMC Ophthalmol, 2021 Oct 25;21(1):378.
    PMID: 34696755 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-021-02145-5
    BACKGROUND: The Quality of Life Impact Refractive Correction (QIRC) questionnaire is a Rasch-validated instrument to assess the quality of life of ametropes with refractive correction. The original QIRC was validated in the United Kingdom. This study aimed to validate the Malay version of the QIRC among refractive correction wearers in Malaysia using Rasch analysis.

    METHODS: The original 20-item QIRC was forward-backward translated into Malay in preparation for the Pilot Malay QIRC. The pilot version was pre-tested on 105 spectacle/contact lens-corrected myopes, and the results were reviewed and cross-culturally adapted to produce the Final Malay QIRC. The final version was self-administered to a new sample of 304 participants. A Rasch analysis was conducted to evaluate the items and response categories of the Pilot and the Final Malay QIRC. Test-retest reliability was also analysed on the Final Malay QIRC.

    RESULTS: Based on the pre-test findings, Rasch analysis revealed a multidimensional scale (functional scale [Items 1 to 13] and emotional scale [Items 14 to 20], which were separated in subsequent analysis), unordered response categories for the functional scale (Category 3 was collapsed into Category 2), one misfit item (Item 3 was removed) and six items required modification (Items 4, 6 to 9, and 12 were reworded and cross-culturally adapted). In the Final Malay QIRC, both the functional and emotional scales had ordered response categories, good person reliability (functional, 0.80; emotional, 0.81) and separation index (functional, 2.01; emotional, 2.06), well-targeted items (targeting precision: functional, 0.28 logits; emotional, 0.08 logits), and satisfactory fit statistics (infit and outfit mean square were less than 1.50 for all items). A noticeable differential item functioning (DIF) between genders was found in Item 18 (DIF contrast, 0.40 logits; p = 0.04). Test-retest reliability analysis demonstrated a high intraclass correlation coefficient (0.94) and Cronbach's alpha (0.97) with a coefficient of repeatability of ±8.14 units.

    CONCLUSIONS: The Malay-translated version of the QIRC has good psychometric characteristics for assessing the quality of life of refractive correction wearers in Malaysia. This translated and cross-culturally adapted Malay QIRC is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used in routine clinical practice.

Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links