MyMedR

Displaying all 4 publications

Abstract:

Sort:

Fulltext The economic burden of zoonotic Plasmodium knowlesi malaria on households in Sabah, Malaysia compared to malaria from human-only Plasmodium species

Abraham P, McMullin C, William T, Rajahram GS, Jelip J, Teo R, et al.

medRxiv, 2024 May 03.
PMID: 38746350 DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.02.24306734

BACKGROUND: The emergence of the zoonotic monkey parasite Plasmodium knowlesi as the dominant cause of malaria in Malaysia has disrupted current national WHO elimination goals. Malaysia has free universal access to malaria care; however, out-of-pocket costs are unknown. This study estimated household costs of illness attributable to malaria due to P. knowlesi against other non-zoonotic Plasmodium species infections in Sabah, Malaysia.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Household costs were estimated from patient-level surveys collected from four hospitals between 2013 and 2016. Direct costs including medical and associated travel costs, and indirect costs due to lost productivity were included. One hundred and fifty-two malaria cases were enrolled: P. knowlesi (n=108), P. vivax (n=22), P. falciparum (n=16), and P. malariae (n=6). Costs were inflated to 2022 Malaysian Ringgits and reported in United States dollars (US$). Across all cases, the mean total costs were US$138 (SD=108), with productivity losses accounting for 58% of costs (US$80; SD=73). P. vivax had the highest mean total household cost at US$210, followed by P. knowlesi (US$127), P. falciparum (US$126), and P. malariae (US$105). Most patients (80%) experienced direct health costs above 10% of monthly income, with 58 (38%) patients experiencing health spending over 25% of monthly income, consistent with catastrophic health expenditure.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Despite Malaysia's free health-system care for malaria, patients and families face other related medical, travel, and indirect costs. Household out-of-pocket costs were driven by productivity losses; primarily attributed to infections in working-aged males in rural agricultural-based occupations. Costs for P. knowlesi were comparable to P. falciparum and lower than P. vivax. The higher P. vivax costs related to direct health facility costs for repeat monitoring visits given the liver-stage treatment required.
AUTHOR SUMMARY: Knowlesi malaria is due to infection with a parasite transmitted by mosquitos from monkeys to humans. Most people who are infected work or live near the forest. It is now the major type of malaria affecting humans in Malaysia. The recent increase of knowlesi malaria cases in humans has impacted individuals, families, and health systems in Southeast Asia. Although the region has made substantial progress towards eliminating human-only malaria species, knowlesi malaria threatens elimination targets as traditional control measures do not address the parasite reservoir in monkeys. The economic burden of illness due to knowlesi malaria has not previously been estimated or subsequently compared with other malaria species. We collected data on the cost of illness to households in Sabah, Malaysia, to estimate their related total economic burden. Medical costs and time off work and usual activities were substantial in patients with the four species of malaria diagnosed during the time of this study. This research highlights the financial burden which households face when seeking care for malaria in Malaysia, despite the free treatment provided by the government.
Fulltext The challenges of introducing routine G6PD testing into radical cure: a workshop report

Ley B, Luter N, Espino FE, Devine A, Kalnoky M, Lubell Y, et al.

Malar J, 2015 Sep 29;14:377.
PMID: 26416229 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-015-0896-8

The only currently available drug that effectively removes malaria hypnozoites from the human host is primaquine. The use of 8-aminoquinolines is hampered by haemolytic side effects in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficient individuals. Recently a number of qualitative and a quantitative rapid diagnostic test (RDT) format have been developed that provide an alternative to the current standard G6PD activity assays. The WHO has recently recommended routine testing of G6PD status prior to primaquine radical cure whenever possible. A workshop was held in the Philippines in early 2015 to discuss key challenges and knowledge gaps that hinder the introduction of routine G6PD testing. Two point-of-care (PoC) test formats for the measurement of G6PD activity are currently available: qualitative tests comparable to malaria RDT as well as biosensors that provide a quantitative reading. Qualitative G6PD PoC tests provide a binomial test result, are easy to use and some products are comparable in price to the widely used fluorescent spot test. Qualitative test results can accurately classify hemizygous males, heterozygous females, but may misclassify females with intermediate G6PD activity. Biosensors provide a more complex quantitative readout and are better suited to identify heterozygous females. While associated with higher costs per sample tested biosensors have the potential for broader use in other scenarios where knowledge of G6PD activity is relevant as well. The introduction of routine G6PD testing is associated with additional costs on top of routine treatment that will vary by setting and will need to be assessed prior to test introduction. Reliable G6PD PoC tests have the potential to play an essential role in future malaria elimination programmes, however require an improved understanding on how to best integrate routine G6PD testing into different health settings.
Fulltext Challenges for achieving safe and effective radical cure of Plasmodium vivax: a round table discussion of the APMEN Vivax Working Group

Thriemer K, Ley B, Bobogare A, Dysoley L, Alam MS, Pasaribu AP, et al.

Malar J, 2017 04 05;16(1):141.
PMID: 28381261 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-017-1784-1

The delivery of safe and effective radical cure for Plasmodium vivax is one of the greatest challenges for achieving malaria elimination from the Asia-Pacific by 2030. During the annual meeting of the Asia Pacific Malaria Elimination Network Vivax Working Group in October 2016, a round table discussion was held to discuss the programmatic issues hindering the widespread use of primaquine (PQ) radical cure. Participants included 73 representatives from 16 partner countries and 33 institutional partners and other research institutes. In this meeting report, the key discussion points are presented and grouped into five themes: (i) current barriers for glucose-6-phosphate deficiency (G6PD) testing prior to PQ radical cure, (ii) necessary properties of G6PD tests for wide scale deployment, (iii) the promotion of G6PD testing, (iv) improving adherence to PQ regimens and (v) the challenges for future tafenoquine (TQ) roll out. Robust point of care (PoC) G6PD tests are needed, which are suitable and cost-effective for clinical settings with limited infrastructure. An affordable and competitive test price is needed, accompanied by sustainable funding for the product with appropriate training of healthcare staff, and robust quality control and assurance processes. In the absence of quantitative PoC G6PD tests, G6PD status can be gauged with qualitative diagnostics, however none of the available tests is currently sensitive enough to guide TQ treatment. TQ introduction will require overcoming additional challenges including the management of severely and intermediately G6PD deficient individuals. Robust strategies are needed to ensure that effective treatment practices can be deployed widely, and these should ensure that the caveats are outweighed by the benefits of radical cure for both the patients and the community. Widespread access to quality controlled G6PD testing will be critical.
Fulltext Quantifying primaquine effectiveness and improving adherence: a round table discussion of the APMEN Vivax Working Group

Thriemer K, Bobogare A, Ley B, Gudo CS, Alam MS, Anstey NM, et al.

Malar J, 2018 Jun 20;17(1):241.
PMID: 29925430 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-018-2380-8

The goal to eliminate malaria from the Asia-Pacific by 2030 will require the safe and widespread delivery of effective radical cure of malaria. In October 2017, the Asia Pacific Malaria Elimination Network Vivax Working Group met to discuss the impediments to primaquine (PQ) radical cure, how these can be overcome and the methodological difficulties in assessing clinical effectiveness of radical cure. The salient discussions of this meeting which involved 110 representatives from 18 partner countries and 21 institutional partner organizations are reported. Context specific strategies to improve adherence are needed to increase understanding and awareness of PQ within affected communities; these must include education and health promotion programs. Lessons learned from other disease programs highlight that a package of approaches has the greatest potential to change patient and prescriber habits, however optimizing the components of this approach and quantifying their effectiveness is challenging. In a trial setting, the reactivity of participants results in patients altering their behaviour and creates inherent bias. Although bias can be reduced by integrating data collection into the routine health care and surveillance systems, this comes at a cost of decreasing the detection of clinical outcomes. Measuring adherence and the factors that relate to it, also requires an in-depth understanding of the context and the underlying sociocultural logic that supports it. Reaching the elimination goal will require innovative approaches to improve radical cure for vivax malaria, as well as the methods to evaluate its effectiveness.