MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study of patients with knee problems that underwent lateral knee radiograph using the knee movement method (KM method), starting from March 2022 until August 2022. Fifty knee radiograph results using the KM method (KM group) were compared to retrospective data from fifty knee radiograph from the patients before March 2022 using the traditional method of lateral knee radiograph as the control (TM group). The data were analysed using the Chi-Square test to see if the KM method is associated with more true lateral knee radiograph results achieved compared to the traditional procedure.
RESULTS: Fifty patients in the KM method group had 80% (n=40) true lateral knee radiographs and 20% (n=10) untrue lateral knee radiographs, while in the Traditional Procedure group from the retrospective data of 50 patients had 44% (n=22) true lateral knee radiographs and 56% (n=28) untrue lateral knee radiographs (P<0.05). There is no significant association between the type of procedure applied with the types of error (P=0.432). Nevertheless, it helps us as it gives a gross picture that most of the errors are under-rotation of the knee, either from the KM method Group 90% (n=9) or the Traditional procedure Group 79% (n=22).
CONCLUSION: The KM method was associated with achievement of a more true and accurate lateral knee radiograph. Additional studies with a larger sample should be done to evaluate the reliability of this method.
METHODS: Retrospective study of 266 patients with objectively proven BAVD (pathology of explanted valves, 4D-CT prior to transcatheter valve-in-valve, or therapeutically confirmed bioprosthetic thrombosis) who were treated. Of those, 191 had obstruction, 48 had regurgitation, 15 had mixed stenosis and regurgitation, and 12 had patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM). Normal controls were matched 1:1 (age, prosthesis size and type), of which 43 had high gradients (PPM in 30, high flow in 9 and normal prosthesis in 9). Algorithm assignment was based on the echocardiogram leading to BAVD diagnosis and the pre-discharge "fingerprint" echocardiogram after surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement. A novel algorithm (Mayo Clinic algorithm) incorporating valve appearance in addition to Doppler parameters was developed to improve observed deficiencies.
RESULTS: The accuracy of existing algorithms was suboptimal (2009 ASE: 62%; 2014 Blauwet-Miller: 62%; 2016 EACVI: 57%). The most common overdiagnosis was PPM (22-29% of patients and controls with high gradients). The novel Mayo Clinic algorithm correctly identified the mechanism in 256 of 307 patients and controls (83%). Recognition of regurgitation was substantially improved (42 of 47 patients, 89%) and the number of PPM misdiagnoses significantly reduced (5 patients).
CONCLUSION: Currently recommended algorithms misclassify a significant number of BAVD patients. The accuracy was improved by a newly proposed algorithm.