OBJECTIVES: To determine incidences of pneumothorax developed spontaneously and during different modes of respiratory support, and risk factors associated with each type of pneumothorax.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational study of neonates in the Malaysian National Neonatal Registry.
SETTING: 44 Malaysian neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).
PARTICIPANTS: All neonates born in 2015-2020 and admitted to NICUs.
RESULTS: Pneumothorax developed in 3265 neonates: 37.5% occurred spontaneously, 62.5% during respiratory support. The incidence of all types of pneumothorax was 1.75 per 1000 livebirths, and of spontaneous pneumothorax was 0.58 per 1000 livebirths. Pneumothorax developed in 0.6% (450/70512) of neonates during continuous positive air way pressure therapy (nCPAPt), 1.8% (990/54994) of neonates during conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV), and 7.0% (599/8557) of neonates during high frequency ventilation (HFV). Term neonates had significantly higher pneumothorax rate than preterms (p<0.001). Multiple logistic regression analyses show that exposure to intermittent positive pressure ventilation and chest compression at birth were significant independent factors associated with increased risk of spontaneous pneumothorax and CMV, and persistent pulmonary hypertension was associated with increased risk of spontaneous pneumothorax and pneumothorax during CMV and HFV.
CONCLUSIONS: The most common type of pneumothorax was spontaneous in-onset. Neonates on HFV had the highest and those on nCPAPt the lowest rate of pneumothorax. Improving training of resuscitation techniques at birth and strategies of use of invasive modes of respiratory support may reduce incidences of all types of pneumothorax.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine EnCPAP rates in 36 neonatal intensive care units of the Malaysian National Neonatal Registry (MNNR) in 2013, to compare the outcomes of VLBW neonates with and without EnCPAP, and to determine whether the availability of CPAP facilities and unit policies played a significant role in EnCPAP rates.
METHODS: First, a retrospective cohort study was conducted of VLBW neonates born in the hospitals participating in the study without major congenital abnormalities in the MNNR. This was followed by a questionnaire survey of these hospitals focussed on CPAP facilities and unit policies.
RESULTS: Of the 2,823 neonates, 963 (34.1%) received EnCPAP. Amongst EnCPAP neonates significantly fewer deaths were recorded (10.9 vs. 21.7%; p < 0.001), less bronchopulmonary dysplasia was observed (BPD; 8.0 vs. 11.7%; p = 0.002) and fewer mechanical ventilation days were necessary (p < 0.001) than in non-EnCPAP neonates. Logistic regression analysis showed that EnCPAP was significantly associated with a lower mortality (adjusted OR 0.623; 95% CI 0.472, 0.824; p = 0.001) and BPD among survivors (adjusted OR 0.585; 95% CI 0.427, 0.802; p = 0.001). The median EnCPAP rate of the 36 hospitals was 28.4% (IQR 14.3-38.7). Hospitals with CPAP facilities in the delivery suites (p = 0.001) and during transport (p = 0.001) and a policy for EnCPAP (p = 0.036) had significantly higher EnCPAP rates.
CONCLUSION: EnCPAP reduced mortality and BPD in Malaysian VLBW neonates. Resource-strapped developing countries should prioritise the use of this low-cost therapy.