Spinal infection comprises pyogenic and non-pyogenic spondylodiscitis. This condition may manifest with non-specific clinical symptoms, elevated infective parameters and imaging findings that are difficult to distinguish. The cornerstone of a definitive diagnosis and subsequent successful treatment lies in tissue analysis through culture and histopathological studies. In this context, we present a case of Salmonella pyogenic spondylodiscitis affecting the C5/C6 vertebrae, complicated by Salmonella bacteraemia and characterised by mechanical neck pain that curtails daily activities and overall functioning, although without neurological deficits. The uniqueness of this case stems from its occurrence in an immunocompetent individual from a non-endemic area, with no identifiable sources of Salmonella infection or preceding gastrointestinal symptoms.
Spinal involvement in primary amyloidosis is an exceedingly rare condition, presenting with typical pathological fracture symptoms that are often indistinguishable from other pathologies such as bone metastasis, metabolic disorders and infections. Histopathological studies for tissue diagnosis are the cornerstone of a definitive diagnosis, leading to successful treatment. Early diagnosis and intervention play a pivotal role in the care of patients with amyloidosis. Here, we present a unique case of a pathological fracture in the L4 vertebra following minor trauma. This fracture manifested with pain, instability and limitations in daily activities in a patient who had already been diagnosed with systemic amyloidosis and was undergoing chemotherapy. This case represents a distinct instance of vertebral involvement in amyloidosis and was managed with both chemotherapy and surgical intervention to address the spinal pathology, resulting in favourable outcomes.
Spinal tuberculosis is an uncommon extrapulmonary manifestation of tuberculosis infection, known as a great masquerade that often mimics other pathologies, such as pyogenic and non-pyogenic infection, bone metastasis, haematological malignancy, and metabolic bone disease. It presents great challenges in establishing a diagnosis, deciding on treatment, and monitoring the response to treatment. A tissue-proven diagnosis is the cornerstone of a definitive diagnosis before initiating medical antitubercular therapy, leading to successful treatment. Here, we present a distinct and rare instance of spinal tuberculosis with an atypical presentation of upper thoracic myelopathy. It involved the cervicothoracic junction, exhibiting minimal axial symptoms but intensive destruction of the affected levels radiologically, along with an incomplete neurological deficit and the possibility of catastrophic neurological complications. The ultimate distinctiveness of this case lies in the diagnostic challenge it posed. Despite undergoing three separate tissue biopsies, tuberculosis infection could not be established, as all results returned negative for cellular, molecular, and histopathological markers, leading to a delay in initiating empirical medical therapy. Nonetheless, the patient responded well to empirical antitubercular therapy, resulting in favourable outcomes. To the best of our knowledge, a case of spinal tuberculosis with numerous negative tissue diagnoses has not been previously reported.
Introduction Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis is a communal problem in the sixth decade of life involving L4/L5 and L5/S1 levels. Lateral spinal stenosis is often underestimated because of no established relationship between the clinical symptoms and MRI findings. We conducted a study to establish an association between the degree of anatomical lateral stenosis, posterior disc height, and disc degeneration from MRI with the daily disability and pain severity for lateral lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods This was a cross-sectional study involving 121 patients with distinct clinical symptoms of lateral lumbar spinal stenosis evaluated from February 2018 to December 2019. The clinical data were evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was assessed qualitatively for the anatomical gradation of lateral spinal stenosis, the magnitude of posterior disc height, and the extent of disc degeneration. Statistical analysis for the correlation between posterior disc height and ODI and VAS scores was evaluated using Pearson's correlation test via SPSS version 23.0 (IBM Inc., Armonk, New York), and the association between the extent of lateral stenosis and disc degeneration on MRI with ODI and VAS scores was determined by the Fisher Exact Test via STATA version 14.0 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas). The association was considered statistically significant with a P-value of less than 0.05. Results The analysis of 121 patients showed the mean age of the patients was 58.7 ± 7.1 years old. The number of female patients was higher compared to male patients, 52.9% and 47.1%, respectively. 97.5% of the patients were married or cohabiting, and 76.0% had an abnormal body mass index. The mean score of ODI and VAS was 62.2 ± 10.7% and 79.3 ± 8.6 respectively. 49.6% of the patient presented with a crippling disability with ODI assessment, while 59.5% presented with high pain intensity with VAS assessment. MRI assessment of anatomical grading lateral stenosis of L4/L5 level revealed that 45.5% of the patients had grade 2 lateral recess stenosis, 63.6% had grade 2 foraminal stenosis, and 44.6% had extraforaminal stenosis. L5/S1 level analysis showed that 43.0% had grade 2 lateral recess stenosis, 62.0% had grade 2 foraminal stenosis, and 29.8% had extraforaminal stenosis. 64.5% of patients had grade 4 disc degeneration of L4/L5 with mean posterior disc height of 7.0mm ±1.7mm while 59.5% had grade 4 disc degeneration of L5/S1 with mean posterior disc height of 6.3mm ±1.8mm. However, no statistically significant association between clinical symptoms and MRI findings was found. Conclusions There was no significant association between the clinical symptoms of pain and disability and the MRI findings for the anatomical gradation of lateral spinal stenosis, the magnitude of posterior disc height, and the extent of disc degeneration. A comprehensive clinical evaluation remains essential for an accurate diagnosis, emphasizing the necessity of appropriately correlating MRI findings with their clinical significance.