METHODS: PubMed, LILACS and Google Scholar were searched for randomized or non-randomized trials enrolling patients with suspected or confirmed dengue where CP extract was compared, as a treatment measure, against standard treatment. Recovery of platelet counts as well as other clinical indicators of favourable outcome (duration of hospital stay, prevention of plasma leakage, life threatening complications, and mortality) were assessed.
RESULTS: Nine studies (India-6, Pakistan-1, Indonesia-1, Malaysia-1) met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies showed an increase in platelet counts in patients receiving CP extract, while one study showed no significant difference between the two groups, and direct comparison was not possible in the remaining study. Serious adverse events were not reported. CP extract may reduce the duration of hospital stay (mean difference - 1.98 days, 95% confidence interval - 1.83 to - 2.12, 3 studies, 580 participants, low quality evidence), and cause improvement in mean platelet counts between the first and fifth day of treatment (mean difference 35.45, 95% confidence interval 23.74 to 47.15, 3 studies, 129 participants, low quality evidence). No evidence was available regarding other clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical value of improvement in platelet count or early discharge is unclear in the absence of more robust indicators of favourable clinical outcome. Current evidence is insufficient to comment on the role of CP extract in dengue. There is a need for further well designed clinical trials examining the effect of CP on platelet counts, plasma leakage, other serious manifestations of dengue, and mortality, with clearly defined outcome measures.
METHODS AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Total nucleic acid (DNA and RNA) was extracted and subjected to mNGS from acute infection plasma of 60 patients from a prospective cohort study in Sri Lanka in which patients with clinically suspected dengue fever were recruited but were later confirmed as dengue-negative by NS1 antigen testing and by dengue-specific reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. mNGS data revealed missed chikungunya and dengue infections in five patients each, and a possible bacterial infection by Klebsiella pneumoniae in another patient. It was not possible to differentiate chikungunya infections from dengue infections based on clinical features or routine non-diagnostic laboratory tests conducted in early infection (e.g., full blood count, C-reactive protein level). Phylogenetic analysis showed that the chikungunya sequences from this study were closely related to those sequenced from Maldives, Malaysia, India and Singapore between 2015-2019.
CONCLUSIONS: Chikungunya infection may masquerade as dengue especially in low- and middle-income countries where dengue is treated based on clinical suspicion only - without confirmatory testing. As both infections are likely prevalent worldwide, but the complications and natural history of chikungunya and dengue infections are quite different, the addition of cheap and accessible diagnostics for both infections should be pursued in endemic countries.