MyMedR

Displaying all 8 publications

Abstract:

Sort:

Epidural analgesia in primigravidae in spontaneous labour at term: a prospective study

Leong EW, Sivanesaratnam V, Oh LL, Chan YK

J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2000 Aug;26(4):271-5.
PMID: 11049237

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively study the intervention rate, duration of labour, malpositions, fetal outcome, maternal satisfaction, voiding complications and adverse events in healthy primigravidae in spontaneous labour at term following epidural analgesia.
METHODS: A prospective randomized study involving 55 patients in the epidural group and 68 in the control pethidine--inhalational entonox group.
RESULTS: There were significantly more obstetric interventions (instrumental deliveries) in the epidural group (p < 0.01). The total duration of labour and the duration of the second stage was prolonged in the epidural group (p < 0.01). There were more malpositions at the second stage of labour in the epidural group (p < 0.02). There were no differences in fetal outcome (Apgar scores and Special Care Nursery admissions). Patients in the epidural group were consistently happier with their method of pain relief (p < 0.01). Two patients required blood patches while another 2 patients had persistent backache post epidural analgesia.
CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia in primigravidae in spontaneous labour at term led to an increased instrumental delivery rate, prolonged duration of labour, greater rate of malpositions in the second stage, increased oxytocin requirements but with no difference in fetal outcomes but with happier mothers as compared to the control group.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Obstetrical*
A survey of the current practice of obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia in Malaysia [correction of Malaysis]

Chan YK, Ng KP

J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2000 Apr;26(2):137-40.
PMID: 10870307

OBJECTIVE: A survey covering 30% of the deliveries in Malaysia was done to determine the practice of obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia for 1996.
RESULTS: From the survey, it was found that the regional anaesthesia rate for caesarean section was 46% in the government hospitals compared to 29.2% in the private hospitals, with spinal anaesthesia being the most common regional anaesthetic technique used in both types of hospitals. The epidural rate for labour analgesia was only 1.5% overall for the country. Epidural analgesia services were available in all private hospitals whereas 17.6% of government hospitals surveyed did not offer this service at all.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of epidural analgesia for labour was low in Malaysia, the overall rate of regional anaesthesia for caesarean section (41.9%) is very much in keeping with the standards of safe practice recommended by the United Kingdom.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Obstetrical/statistics & numerical data*
Fulltext Acceptability of epidural analgesia for pain relief during labour among Kelantanese women

Sharma S, Mohamad NA, Monga D, Achana S

Med J Malaysia, 1996 Dec;51(4):453-6.
PMID: 10968033

Three hundred and five primigravid women were interviewed at term to assess the acceptability of epidural during labour, and reasons for the decisions. Data was collected on a prestructured proforma which consisted of background information, socio-economic status, knowledge about epidural analgesia, source of information and reasons for choice. Of the 305 patients only 17.3% were willing to receive epidural analgesia. This group consisted of 56.6% non-Malay women. Those employed in professional or skilled jobs (56.6%) also readily consented for epidural. Nearly half the women willing for epidural had received college (tertiary) education (43.3%) and more than a quarter (26.4%) were over 30 years of age. The majority of those who were unwilling had no prior knowledge about the procedure, and refused either out of fear, ignorance, resistance from husbands, on religious grounds or following poor feedback from friends. In order to advocate epidural analgesia, knowledge has to be targeted to the relatively less educated, unemployed women, mainly through the media or personally in the antenatal clinic by doctors and nurses. Services have to be improved as substandard analgesia may send out wrong messages and actually do more harm than good.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Obstetrical*
Abdominal nerve blockade for postoperative analgesia after caesarean section

Kuppuvelumani P, Jaradi H, Delilkan A

Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol, 1993 Jun;19(2):165-9.
PMID: 8379864

A prospective study of blocking T10-L1 with local anaesthetic, bilaterally in 30 patients undergoing caesarean section under general anaesthesia has been shown to provide effective postoperative analgesia thus requiring significantly less narcotics (mean 66.6 mg of pethidine) compared to the 30 patients in the control group (mean 163 mg of pethidine). A cocktail of 0.5% of bupivacaine with adrenaline and xylocaine 1% produced analgesia for the duration ranging from 8 to 12 hours (mean 8.4 hours). Patients with abdominal field block were awake, alert and comfortable during the immediate postoperative period. They were pain-free sufficiently to put the babies to the breast early and frequently.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Obstetrical/methods*
Fulltext Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: its effects on delivery outcome

Singh SK, Yahya N, Misiran K, Masdar A, Nor NM, Yee LC

Braz J Anesthesiol, 2016 May-Jun;66(3):259-64.
PMID: 27108822 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.09.006

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Combined spinal-epidural (CSE) has become an increasingly popular alternative to traditional labour epidural due to its rapid onset and reliable analgesia provided. This was a prospective, convenient sampling study to determine the effects of CSE analgesia on labour outcome.

METHODS: One hundred and ten healthy primigravida parturients with a singleton pregnancy of ≥37 weeks gestation and in the active phase of labour were studied. They were enrolled to the CSE (n=55) or Non-CSE (n=55) group based on whether they consented to CSE analgesia. Non-CSE parturients were offered other methods of labour analgesia. The duration of the first and second stage of labour, rate of instrumental vaginal delivery and emergency cesarean section, and Apgar scores were compared.

RESULTS: The mean duration of the first and second stage of labour was not significantly different between both groups. Instrumental delivery rates between the groups were not significantly different (CSE group, 11% versus Non-CSE group, 16%). The slightly higher incidence of cesarean section in the CSE group (16% versus 15% in the Non-CSE group) was not statistically significant. Neonatal outcome in terms of Apgar score of less than 7 at 1 and 5min was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in the duration of labour, rate of instrumental vaginal delivery and emergency cesarean section, and neonatal outcome in parturients who received compared to those who did not receive CSE for labour analgesia.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Obstetrical/methods*
Fulltext A comparative study of post operative analgesia, side effects profile and patient satisfaction using intrathecal fentanyl with and without morphine 0.1 mg in caesarean section

Sawi W, Choy YC

Middle East J Anaesthesiol, 2013 Feb;22(1):21-6.
PMID: 23833846

BACKGROUND: This was a double-blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial to compare the postoperative analgesia, side effects profile and overall satisfaction in patients who received intrathecal fentanyl with or without morphine for elective Caesarean.
METHODS: Sixty ASA I and II parturients were randomized into two groups. Group I received intrathecal fentanyl with 0.1 mg morphine and Group II received intrathecal fentanyl only. Postoperatively, all patients were provided with oral analgesics. The degree of post-operative pain score was assessed by verbal pain score. The incidence of side effects was assessed every 4 hours for 24 hours, which included incidence of nausea, vomiting, pruritus, sedation and evidence of respiratory depression. Patient's overall satisfaction was also recorded.
RESULTS: The verbal pain score was significantly lower in morphine group up to 20 hours postoperative period. The incidence of pruritus, nausea and vomiting were statistically significant up to 12 hours postoperative. There was no incidence of severe side effects in all the patients. There was significant difference between the morphine and no morphine group in terms of overall patient satisfaction.
CONCLUSION: There was significant difference in terms of lower pain score, higher incidence of side effects with better patients' overall satisfaction in morphine group.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Obstetrical*
Fulltext Comparison of morphine with fentanyl added to intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for analgesia after caesarean section

Siti Salmah G, Choy YC

Med J Malaysia, 2009 Mar;64(1):71-4.
PMID: 19852327 MyJurnal

This was a prospective randomised, controlled, single-blind study done to determine the effect of intrathecal morphine 0.1 mg as compared with intrathecal fentanyl 25 microg in terms of analgesia and duration for postoperative pain relief after Caesarean section. Sixty ASA I or II parturients were randomised into two groups. Group 1 (n=33) received 1.8 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine combined with 0.1 mg morphine while Group 2 (n=27) received 1.8 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine combined with 25 microg fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia. Postoperatively, all patients were provided with patient controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine. Pain was assessed using visual analogue score (VAS) at 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours. Time to first demand of PCA morphine, cumulative PCA morphine requirement and opioid side effects were documented. The VAS for pain and the cumulative PCA morphine requirement were both significantly lower in Group 1 (p < 0.05) during the 24 hours study period. The time to first demand was also significantly longer in Group 1 (p < 0.05). Overall, there were no significant difference between the two groups in side effects, except for a high incidence of nausea and vomiting requiring treatment in Group B in the first six hours. In conclusion the addition of 0.1 mg morphine for spinal anaesthesia provided superior and longer postoperative analgesia after Caesarean section.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Obstetrical*
Fulltext Comparison of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with basal infusion and programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) with PCEA in labour analgesia – A year retrospective study

Zawiah Kassim, Norliza Mohd Nor, Ariffah Mokhtar, Suhaina Mohamad, Sarina Osman, Isqandar Adnan

Journal of Clinical and Health Sciences, 2021;6(1):25-31.
MyJurnal

Introduction: Over three decades, patient-controlled epidural analgesia with a basal infusion
regimen (PCEA+BI) has successfully improved labour analgesia quality due to its advantage
in allowing self-titration by the parturients. Recently, a newer programmed intermittent epidural
bolus with PCEA regimen (PIEB+PCEA) was suggested to improve the epidural spread of
local anaesthetic hence resulted in better analgesia quality and higher maternal satisfaction.
Methods: We conducted a one-year retrospective analysis of data from obstetric analgesia
service record sheet and hospital information system comparing maternal satisfaction towards
their labour analgesia quality, mode of delivery and neonatal Apgar scores between these two
methods of epidural delivery techniques. A total of 343 parturients were recruited in this study
(PCEA+BI n=171, PIEB+PCEA n=172). Results: There were no significant difference in
maternal satisfaction between the two groups (P=0.398) with a higher percentage of excellent
satisfaction were found in the PIEB+PCEA group (PIEB+PCEA 146/172 (84.9%) vs PCEA+BI
138/171 (80.7%)). No significant difference in the mode of delivery (P=0.296). However, the
PIEB+PCEA group shown a higher spontaneous vaginal delivery rate (PIEB+PCEA 87/172
(50.6%) vs PCEA+BI 70/171 (40.9%) and lower Caesarean delivery rate (PIEB+PCEA 71/172
(41.3%) vs PCEA+BI 87/171 (50.9%)). Despite statistically significant differences found in
Apgar scores at 1 minute (P=0.036), there was no significant difference in the scores at 5
minutes (P=0.107). Mean Apgar scores (SD) at 1 minute and 5 minutes for PIEB+ PCEA were
7.77(0.85) and 8.91(0.55) respectively and for PCEA + basal infusion, the scores for 1 minute
and 5 minutes were 7.92(0.39) and 8.98(0.19) respectively. Conclusion: PIEB with PCEA is
a newer epidural delivery technique for labour analgesia which produces a comparable
outcome to PCEA with basal infusion.

Matched MeSH terms: Analgesia, Obstetrical