Increasing evidence suggests that inflammation plays an important role in the development of both cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Recently C-reactive protein (CRP) levels have been reported to be a prognostic factor for cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the prognostic value of CRP levels in a first ever ischaemic stroke at one month. All ischaemic stroke patients who were admitted to Hospital Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (HUKM) between May 2002 and July 2002 were eligible for the study. CRP levels were taken within 72 hours after an acute ischaemic stroke. The functional ability was assessed using the Barthel Index (BI) after one month of stroke. During the study period 84 patients were admitted to HUKM with the diagnosis of ischaemic stroke; 49 patients were enrolled and 35 were excluded. Twenty-nine patients (59.2%) had elevated CRP levels (median 1.64+/-3.07 mg/dL, range 0.06 to 16.21 mg/dL). Elevated CRP levels were found to be a predictor of severe functional disability (BI<5) and were also associated with larger infarcts. In conclusion, elevated CRP levels are associated with poorer functional outcome and predict a larger infarct size.
BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), antiplatelets (APs), and statin are increasingly being prescribed for ischemic stroke prevention.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to examine whether previous combination therapy of ACEI with AP and/or statin has additive effect compared with ACEI alone on functional outcome after ischemic stroke. Furthermore, factors associated with improving functional outcome were investigated.
METHODS: Ischemic stroke patients attending a Malaysian hospital in 2008 were categorized according to Barthel Index at discharge. Favorable outcome was defined as Barthel Index of 75 or greater. Data included demographic information, clinical characteristics, and previous medications with particular attention to ACEI, AP, and statin.
RESULTS: Overall, 505 patients were included. Variables associated with good functional outcome were younger age (P = 0.002), first-ever attack (P = 0.016), lacunar (P = 0.015) or posterior circulation infarct stroke subtype (P = 0.034), minor Glasgow Coma Scale (P < 0.001), and previous use of ACEI alone or combined with AP and/or statin (P = 0.002). Using ACEI alone as the reference for ACEI + AP, ACEI + statin, or ACEI + AP + statin combinations, there was no significant difference among combinations on improving functional outcome (P = 0.852).
CONCLUSIONS: Prestroke use of ACEI either alone or combined with AP and/or statin was associated with better functional outcome. Previous use of ACEI in combination with AP and/or statin did not significantly differ from ACEI alone in their effect on outcome. Our study provides a potential rationale for optimizing the use of ACEI among individuals at risk of developing ischemic stroke.
BACKGROUND:Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability, especially in low-income and middle-income countries. We sought to quantify the importance of potentially modifiable risk factors for stroke in different regions of the world, and in key populations and primary pathological subtypes of stroke.
METHODS:We completed a standardised international case-control study in 32 countries in Asia, America, Europe, Australia, the Middle East, and Africa. Cases were patients with acute first stroke (within 5 days of symptom onset and 72 h of hospital admission). Controls were hospital-based or community-based individuals with no history of stroke, and were matched with cases, recruited in a 1:1 ratio, for age and sex. All participants completed a clinical assessment and were requested to provide blood and urine samples. Odds ratios (OR) and their population attributable risks (PARs) were calculated, with 99% confidence intervals.
FINDINGS: Between Jan 11, 2007, and Aug 8, 2015, 26 919 participants were recruited from 32 countries (13 447 cases [10 388 with ischaemic stroke and 3059 intracerebral haemorrhage] and 13 472 controls). Previous history of hypertension or blood pressure of 140/90 mm Hg or higher (OR 2·98, 99% CI 2·72-3·28; PAR 47·9%, 99% CI 45·1-50·6), regular physical activity (0·60, 0·52-0·70; 35·8%, 27·7-44·7), apolipoprotein (Apo)B/ApoA1 ratio (1·84, 1·65-2·06 for highest vs lowest tertile; 26·8%, 22·2-31·9 for top two tertiles vs lowest tertile), diet (0·60, 0·53-0·67 for highest vs lowest tertile of modified Alternative Healthy Eating Index [mAHEI]; 23·2%, 18·2-28·9 for lowest two tertiles vs highest tertile of mAHEI), waist-to-hip ratio (1·44, 1·27-1·64 for highest vs lowest tertile; 18·6%, 13·3-25·3 for top two tertiles vs lowest), psychosocial factors (2·20, 1·78-2·72; 17·4%, 13·1-22·6), current smoking (1·67, 1·49-1·87; 12·4%, 10·2-14·9), cardiac causes (3·17, 2·68-3·75; 9·1%, 8·0-10·2), alcohol consumption (2·09, 1·64-2·67 for high or heavy episodic intake vs never or former drinker; 5·8%, 3·4-9·7 for current alcohol drinker vs never or former drinker), and diabetes mellitus (1·16, 1·05-1·30; 3·9%, 1·9-7·6) were associated with all stroke. Collectively, these risk factors accounted for 90·7% of the PAR for all stroke worldwide (91·5% for ischaemic stroke, 87·1% for intracerebral haemorrhage), and were consistent across regions (ranging from 82·7% in Africa to 97·4% in southeast Asia), sex (90·6% in men and in women), and age groups (92·2% in patients aged ≤55 years, 90·0% in patients aged >55 years). We observed regional variations in the importance of individual risk factors, which were related to variations in the magnitude of ORs (rather than direction, which we observed for diet) and differences in prevalence of risk factors among regions. Hypertension was more associated with intracerebral haemorrhage than with ischaemic stroke, whereas current smoking, diabetes, apolipoproteins, and cardiac causes were more associated with ischaemic stroke (p<0·0001).
INTERPRETATION: Ten potentially modifiable risk factors are collectively associated with about 90% of the PAR of stroke in each major region of the world, among ethnic groups, in men and women, and in all ages. However, we found important regional variations in the relative importance of most individual risk factors for stroke, which could contribute to worldwide variations in frequency and case-mix of stroke. Our findings support developing both global and region-specific programmes to prevent stroke.
FUNDING: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Canadian Stroke Network, Health Research Board Ireland, Swedish Research Council, Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, The Health & Medical Care Committee of the Regional Executive Board, Region Västra Götaland (Sweden), AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada), Pfizer (Canada), MSD, Chest, Heart and Stroke Scotland, and The Stroke Association, with support from The UK Stroke Research Network.