METHODS: Sixty individuals with molecularly confirmed RNU4ATAC-opathy were recruited from multiple clinical and research centers internationally. RNA-seq was available for 7 affected individuals.
RESULTS: We report the clinical and molecular findings of 60 individuals, including 42 not previously described, and 33 distinct RNU4ATAC variants, 13 of which are novel. Core features in this cohort-present in most individuals assessed and varying in severity-include microcephaly, short stature, skeletal anomalies, developmental delay, cerebral anomalies, skin conditions, and immune deficiency. Additional findings, such as diabetes, holoprosencephaly, and the absence of various core features in some individuals, highlight the broad phenotypic spectrum. All individuals who underwent RNA-seq showed a consistent pattern of minor intron retention. In 6 individuals, RNA-seq enabled the reclassification of variants of uncertain significance as likely pathogenic. Although RNU4ATAC variants are generally covered by clinical exomes, they are often overlooked in analysis because of their noncoding nature.
CONCLUSION: This study highlights the variability of phenotypes and genotypes associated with RNU4ATAC-opathy. Laboratories should ensure RNU4ATAC and other noncoding genes are appropriately assessed by their analysis pipelines.
Methods: This survey research was conducted from August to December 2018 through a pre-tested, self-administration, and cross-sectional random convenient sampling at various districts in the Klang Valley. A total of 275 registered community pharmacists were involved in this study by completing a pilot-tested questionnaire. Descriptive analysis, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-Wallis H test were used to analyze the data.
Results: The knowledge toward Zika virus infection of respondents was classified into "poor" (5.1%), "basic" (70.9%), and "broad" (24.0%). Most of the participants (n = 195, 70.9%) presented with basic knowledge toward Zika virus infection. A total of 268 (97.5%) participants presented with high awareness toward Zika virus infection. The mean score of respondents' knowledge and awareness was 15.88 ± 3.61 (maximum score = 28) and 13.96 ± 1.60 (maximum score = 16), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the years of practice of community pharmacists and the level of knowledge toward Zika virus infection.
Conclusions: In conclusion, our respondents demonstrated a basic level of knowledge and high awareness toward Zika virus infection. Also, we highlighted some possible pitfalls in the knowledge of Zika virus infection, including the virus transmission, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and complications of the disease.