RESULTS: A total of 103 cases with intracranial haemorrhage i.e. intracerebral haemorrhage, extradural haemorrhage, subdural haemorrhage, intraventricular haemorrhage, haemorrhagic contusion and subarachnoid haemorrhage, following motor vehicle accidents was undertaken to study factors contributing to either good or poor outcome according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Patients below 12 years of age were excluded. The end point of the study was taken at 24 months post injury. The selected variables were incorporated into models generated by logistic regression techniques of multivariate analysis to see the significant predictors of outcome as well as the correlation between the CT findings with GCS.
CONCLUSION: Significant predictors of outcome were GCS on arrival in the accident emergency department, pupillary reflex and the CT scan findings. The CT predictors of outcome include ICH, EDH, IVH, present of SAH, site of ICH, volumes of EDH and SDH as well as midline shift.
CASE REPORT: We report a case of paraparetic spectrum of GBS in a 53-year-old lady who presented with rapidly progressive acute flaccid paralysis involving both lower extremities with areflexia eight days after the first dose of Sinovac vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 in Malaysia. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) albuminocytological dissociation was seen and nerve conduction study (NCS) revealed sensory neuropathy. The diagnosis of GBS was made based on the Brighton criteria. Patient responded well to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG).
CONCLUSION: Though there is currently no convincing evidence of any causation between GBS and SARS- CoV-2 vaccination, clinicians should remain vigilant and consider GBS in the differential diagnosis for patient who presents with weakness with reduced or absent deep tendon reflex after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed at Nottingham University Hospital, UK. A total of 102 women (polycystic ovary syndrome, endometrial cancer and controls; 34 participants in each group) were recruited. Clinical and biochemical assessments were performed before endometrial biopsies were obtained from all participants. Taqman real-time polymerase chain reaction for endometrial sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 gene and its systemic protein expression were analyzed.
RESULTS: The body mass indices of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (29.28 ± 2.91 kg/m(2) ) and controls (28.58 ± 2.62 kg/m(2) ) were not significantly different. Women with endometrial cancer had a higher mean body mass index (32.22 ± 5.70 kg/m(2) ). Sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 gene expression was significantly increased in polycystic ovary syndrome and endometrial cancer endometrium compared with controls (p
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective observational study the records of patients attending a tertiary urogynecological unit between January 2012 and December 2014 were analyzed. POP assessment included a standardized interview, clinical examination using Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification and four-dimensional translabial ultrasound. Puborectalis muscle trauma was assessed with tomographic ultrasound imaging using two continuous scoring systems and a previously established discrete system. Receiver operating characteristics and adjusted odds ratios were used for comparison of scoring systems in predicting symptoms and signs of POP.
RESULTS: Of 1258 women analyzed, 52.6% complained of prolapse symptoms. On ultrasound imaging, 65.7% of women had sonographically significant POP. Complete avulsion was diagnosed in 25.3% of women, being unilateral in 13.9% and bilateral in 11.4%. A maximum score in the 6-point and the 12-point tomographic ultrasound imaging scale increased the odds for a diagnosis of any significant POP on ultrasound by 4.4 and 4.8 times, respectively, compared with 4.6 times for the discrete diagnosis of bilateral avulsion. For all avulsion scoring systems the relation was strongest for cystocele and uterine prolapse.
CONCLUSIONS: A continuous avulsion scoring system based on tomographic findings does not provide superior performance for the prediction of subjective symptoms and objective findings of prolapse compared with a discrete diagnostic system of unilateral or bilateral avulsion.