METHODOLOGY: This prospective study compared the performance of nine commonly used PEs, including the Harris-Benedict (H-B1919), Penn State, and TAH equations, with ML models (XGBoost, Random Forest Regressor [RFR], Support Vector Regression), and DL models (Convolutional Neural Networks [CNN]) in estimating REE in critically ill patients. A dataset of 300 IC measurements from an intensive care unit (ICU) was used, with REE measured by both IC and PEs. The ML/DL models were trained using a combination of static (i.e., age, height, body weight) and dynamic (i.e., minute ventilation, body temperature) variables. A five-fold cross validation was performed to assess the model prediction performance using the root mean square error (RMSE) metric.
RESULTS: Of the PEs analysed, H-B1919 yielded the lowest RMSE at 362 calories. However, the XGBoost and RFR models significantly outperformed all PEs, achieving RMSE values of 199 and 200 calories, respectively. The CNN model demonstrated the poorest performance among ML models, with an RMSE of 250 calories. The inclusion of additional categorical variables such as body mass index (BMI) and body temperature classes slightly reduced RMSE across ML and DL models. Despite data augmentation and imputation techniques, no significant improvements in model performance were observed.
CONCLUSION: ML models, particularly XGBoost and RFR, provide more accurate REE estimations than traditional PEs, highlighting their potential to better capture the complex, non-linear relationships between physiological variables and REE. These models offer a promising alternative for guiding nutritional therapy in clinical settings, though further validation on independent datasets and across diverse patient populations is warranted.
METHODS: This study analyzed dengue cases from January 2014 to December 2021 and COVID-19 confirmed cases from January 2020 to December 2021 which was divided into the pre (2014 to 2019) and during COVID-19 pandemic (2020 to 2021) phases. The average annual dengue case incidence for geographical and demographic subgroups were calculated and compared between the pre and during the COVID-19 pandemic phases. In addition, Spearman rank correlation was performed to determine the correlation between weekly dengue and COVID-19 cases during the COVID-19 pandemic phase.
RESULTS: Dengue trends in Malaysia showed a 4-year cyclical trend with dengue case incidence peaking in 2015 and 2019 and subsequently decreasing in the following years. Reductions of 44.0% in average dengue cases during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic phase was observed at the national level. Higher dengue cases were reported among males, individuals aged 20-34 years, and Malaysians across both phases. Weekly dengue cases were significantly correlated (ρ = -0.901) with COVID-19 cases during the COVID-19 pandemic.
CONCLUSION: There was a reduction in dengue incidence during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic phase. Significant reductions were observed across all demographic groups except for the older population (>75 years) across the two phases.