MyMedR

Displaying all 3 publications

Abstract:

Sort:

Fulltext Telescoping Allograft Prosthetic Composite (APC) Reconstruction of the Femur Following Revision Arthroplasty for Neglected Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH)

Yuen JC, Pang HN, Kow RY

Cureus, 2023 Jun;15(6):e39925.
PMID: 37409196 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.39925

Although uncommon, neglected developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) poses a technically demanding problem for treating surgeons. Due to the congenital malformation of the native hip joint and distortion of the surrounding soft tissue, addressing limb-length discrepancy is intricate. Despite detailed planning and meticulous soft tissue handling, complications can be difficult to avoid in these patients even under experienced hands. In this case report, we present a 73-year-old lady with neglected DDH who had undergone initial total hip arthroplasty and subsequent revision surgery that failed due to aseptic loosening. Due to limited length in the distal femur, we used a telescoping allograft prosthetic composite (APC) to provide adequate length to the native distal femur during revision with proximal femur fixation. This technique can help avoid the need for total femur replacement (TFR) surgery, which is more invasive and may require tibia replacement.
Fulltext Patient-reported Outcome Measures of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Prosthetic Joint Infection is not Inferior to Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Lim J, Pang HN, Tay K, Chia SL, Yeo SJ, Lo NN

Malays Orthop J, 2020 Nov;14(3):73-81.
PMID: 33403065 DOI: 10.5704/MOJ.2011.012

Introduction: This study aims to investigate whether patients undergoing two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and one-stage revision THA for aseptic reasons have similar clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction during their post-operative follow-up. We hypothesise that the two-stage revision THA for PJI is associated with poorer outcomes as compared to aseptic revision THA.
Materials and Methods: We reviewed prospectively collected data in our tertiary hospital arthroplasty registry and identified patients who underwent revision THA between 2001 and 2014, with a minimum of two years follow-up. The study group (two-stage revision THA for PJI) consists of 23 patients and the control group (one-stage revision THA for aseptic reasons) consists of 231 patients. Patient demographics, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores and patient reported satisfaction were evaluated. Student's t-test was used to compare continuous variables between the two groups. Statistical significance was defined as p <0.05.
Results: The pre-operative demographics and clinical scores were relatively similar between the two groups of patients. At two years, patients who underwent revision THA for PJI reported a better WOMAC Pain Score and OHS as compared to aseptic revision THA. A similar proportion of patients were satisfied with their results of surgery in both groups (p=0.093).
Conclusions: Although patients who underwent revision THA for PJI had poorer pre-operative functional scores (WOMAC function and SF-36 PF), at two years follow-up, these two groups of patients have comparable post-operative outcomes. Interestingly, patients who had revision THA for PJI reported a better clinical outcome in terms of OHS and WOMAC Pain score as compared to the aseptic group. We conclude that the revision THA for PJI is not inferior to aseptic revision THA in terms of patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes.
Fulltext Long-Term Outcomes of Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) Implant in Hip Arthroplasty: A Single Institution Review

Yuen JC, Pang HN, Woo YL, Lo NN, Keng Jin DT, Chia SL, et al.

Cureus, 2023 Mar;15(3):e36029.
PMID: 36915400 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.36029

Various metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip replacements (THRs) have been found to have high short-term failure rates due to adverse responses to metal debris (ARMD). As a consequence, several low-performing THRs have been removed off the market. The purpose of this research was to look at the at least five-year outcomes of patients who had MoM hip arthroplasty at our institution. In one specialised centre between 2007 and 2008, 24 Articular Surface Replacement (ASRTM, DePuy, Warsaw, IN, USA) MoM THRs (in 24 patients, mean age: 56.4 years) were implanted. DePuy ASR hip prosthesis for osteoarthritis or hip fractures were employed in the THR system. All patients were summoned back for a clinical assessment, and imaging was done as needed. The average period of follow-up was 8.0 years (6.0-10 years). In all, eight instances (33.3%) were discovered to have pseudotumors, four hips (16.7%) were revised, and one (4.1%) was operated for ARMD. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and Oxford ratings improved statistically significantly five years after surgery in all three areas of pain, disability, and stiffness; however, there was no statistically significant change in the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) (mental) score. MoM hip arthroplasty had a greater revision incidence at five years in our group, presumably owing to the adoption of a smaller femoral head size.

Filters

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links