MyMedR

Displaying all 6 publications

Abstract:

Sort:

Comparing various cut-offs of aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) in liver cirrhosis diagnosis among hepatitis C patients in Malaysia

Mohd Suan MA, Chan HK, Sem XH, Shilton S, Abu Hassan MR

Med J Malaysia, 2021 Nov;76(6):828-832.
PMID: 34806668

INTRODUCTION: A major challenge in providing hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment at primary healthcare clinics is the lack of radiological facilities to guide the decision making of liver cirrhosis (LC). This study aimed to compare the performance of three commonly used cut-offs of the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) in diagnosing LC among hepatitis C patients in Malaysia.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study was based on the data collected from the Hepatitis C Elimination through Access to Diagnostics (HEAD-Start) study in 25 primary healthcare clinics across three regions of Malaysia. The findings of biochemical tests were used to calculate the APRI for each study participant. Transient elastography was used as a standard reference for the diagnosis of cirrhosis. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) was used to determine the discriminative ability of APRI in both HCV mono-infected and HCV/HIV co-infected patients. The diagnostic performance of APRI at three different cutoffs (>1.0, ≥1.5 and >2.0) were also evaluated.
RESULTS: This study included 867 HCV-RNA-positive patients, 158 (16.1%) were co-infected with HIV. For the HCV mono-infected patients, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) for the cut-off of >1.0 were 61.8%, 88.7%, 73.8% and 81.9%, and for the cut-off of ≥1.5, 45.6%, 97.0%, 88.7% and 77.6%, respectively. A much lower sensitivity (29.9%) was observed for the cut-off of >2.0. The diagnostic accuracy of APRI at the cut-off of ≥1.5 in the HCV/HIV co-infected patients was relatively suboptimal.
CONCLUSION: APRI, with a cut-off of ≥1.5, can more accurately predict LC among hepatitis C patients in Malaysia. However, additional physical examination and laboratory assessment are likely to be required to support the diagnosis, especially in those with HCV/HIV co-infection.
Fulltext Diagnostic performance of two non-invasive biomarkers used individually and in sequential combination for cirrhosis associated with hepatitis C virus infection

Suan MAM, Chan HK, Sem X, Shilton S, Hassan MRA

Sci Rep, 2022 Nov 23;12(1):20153.
PMID: 36418369 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-24612-9

This cross-sectional study evaluated the performance of the Aspartate Aminotransferase-to-Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) and the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) Index when they were used individually and in sequential combination to diagnose cirrhosis associated with hepatitis C virus infection. The final evaluation involved 906 people living with hepatitis C. The diagnostic performance of individual biomarkers at cut-off scores of 1.5 and 2.0 for the APRI and at 3.25 for the FIB-4 index was assessed. For the sequential combination method, the cirrhosis status of individuals with an APRI score between 1.0 and 1.5 were reassessed using the FIB-4. Transient elastography (TE) was used as the reference standard for diagnosing cirrhosis. The APRI, at a cut-off score of 1.5, showed a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 44.9%, 97.6%, 91.1% and 76.3%, respectively. Increasing the cut-off score to 2.0 produced a much lower sensitivity (29.6%) and NPV (71.9%). The FIB-4, at a cut-off score of 3.25, yielded a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 40.8%, 97.3%, 89.1% and 75.0%, respectively. The sequential combination method demonstrated a much more optimal diagnostic performance (50.2% sensitivity, 96.6% specificity, 89.0% PPV and 77.9% NPV). Overall, the APRI and FIB-4 Index performed better in diagnosing cirrhosis associated with hepatitis C when they were used in sequential combination.
Fulltext Assessing feasibility of a modified same-day test-and-treat model for hepatitis C among rural people who inject drugs

Hassan MRA, Chan HK, Nordin M, Yahya R, Sulaiman WRW, Merican SAA, et al.

Harm Reduct J, 2023 Apr 12;20(1):48.
PMID: 37046294 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-023-00780-3

BACKGROUND: Despite advancements in hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment, low uptake among hard-to-reach populations remains a global issue. The current study aimed to assess the feasibility of a modified same-day test-and-treat model in improving HCV care for people who inject drugs (PWID) living in resource-constrained rural areas.
METHODS: A pilot study was conducted in four primary healthcare (PHC) centers in Malaysia. The model's key features included on-site HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) testing using a shared GeneXpert® system; noninvasive biomarkers for cirrhosis diagnosis; and extended care to PWID referred from nearby PHC centers and outreach programs. The feasibility assessment focused on three aspects of the model: demand (i.e., uptake of HCV RNA testing and treatment), implementation (i.e., achievement of each step in the HCV care cascade), and practicality (i.e., ability to identify PWID with HCV and expedite treatment initiation despite resource constraints).
RESULTS: A total of 199 anti-HCV-positive PWID were recruited. They demonstrated high demand for HCV care, with a 100% uptake of HCV RNA testing and 97.4% uptake of direct-acting antiviral treatment. The rates of HCV RNA positivity (78.4%) and sustained virologic response (92.2%) were comparable to standard practice, indicating the successful implementation of the model. The model was also practical, as it covered non-opioid-substitution-therapy-receiving individuals and enabled same-day treatment in 71.1% of the participants.
CONCLUSIONS: The modified same-day test-and-treat model is feasible in improving HCV care for rural PWID. The study finding suggests its potential for wider adoption in HCV care for hard-to-reach populations.
Correction: Assessing feasibility of a modified same-day test-and-treat model for hepatitis C among rural people who inject drugs

Hassan MRA, Chan HK, Nordin M, Yahya R, Sulaiman WRW, Merican SAA, et al.

Harm Reduct J, 2023 May 19;20(1):67.
PMID: 37208709 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-023-00800-2
Usability and acceptability of oral fluid- and blood-based hepatitis C virus self-testing among the general population and men who have sex with men in Malaysia

Chan HK, Sem X, Ivanova Reipold E, Pannir Selvam SBA, Salleh NA, Mohamad Gani AHB, et al.

PLOS Glob Public Health, 2024;4(1):e0001770.
PMID: 38170720 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001770

Hepatitis C self-testing (HCVST) is emerging as an additional strategy that could help to expand access to HCV testing. We conducted a study to assess the usability and acceptability of two types of HCVST, oral fluid- and blood-based, among the general population and men who have sex with men (MSM) in Malaysia. An observational study was conducted in three primary care centres in Malaysia. Participants who were layman users performed the oral fluid- and blood-based HCVST sequentially. Usability was assessed by calculating the rate of errors observed, the rate of difficulties faced by participants as well as inter-reader (self-test interpreted by self-tester vs interpreted by trained user) and inter-operator concordances (self-test vs test performed by trained user). The acceptability of HCV self-testing was assessed using an interviewer-administered semi-structured questionnaire. Participants were also required to read contrived test results which included "positive", "negative", and "invalid". There was a total of 200 participants (100 general population, 100 MSM; mean age 33.6 ± 14.0 years). We found a high acceptability of oral fluid- and blood-based HCVST across both general population and MSM. User errors, related to timekeeping and reading within stipulated time, were common. However, the majority of the participants were still able to obtain and interpret results correctly, including that of contrived results, although there was substantial difficulty interpreting weak positive results. The high acceptability of HCVST among the participants did not appreciably change after they had experienced both tests, with 97.0% of all participants indicating they would be willing to use HCVST again and 98.5% of them indicating they would recommend it to people they knew. There was no significant difference between the general population and MSM in these aspects. Our study demonstrates that both oral fluid- and blood-based HCVST are highly acceptable among both the general population and MSM. Both populations also showed comparable ability to conduct the tests and interpret the results. Overall, this study suggests that HCVST could be introduced as an addition to existing HCV testing services in Malaysia. Further studies are needed to establish the optimal positioning of self-testing alongside facility-based testing to expand access to HCV diagnosis in the country.
Fulltext Assessing the impact of simplified HCV care on linkage to care amongst high-risk patients at primary healthcare clinics in Malaysia: a prospective observational study

Markby J, Shilton S, Sem X, Chan HK, Md Said R, Siva S, et al.

BMJ Open, 2021 Dec 24;11(12):e055142.
PMID: 34952885 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055142

INTRODUCTION: To achieve the elimination of hepatitis C virus (HCV), substantial scale-up in access to testing and treatment is needed. This will require innovation and simplification of the care pathway, through decentralisation of testing and treatment to primary care settings and task-shifting to non-specialists. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of decentralisation of HCV testing and treatment using rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) in primary healthcare clinics (PHCs) among high-risk populations, with referral of seropositive patients for confirmatory viral load testing and treatment.
METHODS: This observational study was conducted between December 2018 and October 2019 at 25 PHCs in three regions in Malaysia. Each PHC was linked to one or more hospitals, for referral of seropositive participants for confirmatory testing and pretreatment evaluation. Treatment was provided in PHCs for non-cirrhotic patients and at hospitals for cirrhotic patients.
RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 15 366 adults were screened at the 25 PHCs, using RDTs for HCV antibodies. Of the 2020 (13.2%) HCV antibody-positive participants, 1481/2020 (73.3%) had a confirmatory viral load test, 1241/1481 (83.8%) were HCV RNA-positive, 991/1241 (79.9%) completed pretreatment assessment, 632/991 (63.8%) initiated treatment, 518/632 (82.0%) completed treatment, 352/518 (68.0%) were eligible for a sustained virological response (SVR) cure assessment, 209/352 (59.4%) had an SVR cure assessment, and SVR was achieved in 202/209 (96.7%) patients. A significantly higher proportion of patients referred to PHCs initiated treatment compared with those who had treatment initiated at hospitals (71.0% vs 48.8%, p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the effectiveness and feasibility of a simplified decentralised HCV testing and treatment model in primary healthcare settings, targeting high-risk groups in Malaysia. There were good outcomes across most steps of the cascade of care when treatment was provided at PHCs compared with hospitals.