Displaying all 2 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Bhargava V, Meena P, Agrawaal KK, Wijayaratne D, Kar S, Qayyum A, et al.
    Perit Dial Int, 2024 Jul 23.
    PMID: 39042940 DOI: 10.1177/08968608241263396
    Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a well-established modality for kidney replacement therapy (KRT) globally, offering benefits such as better preservation of residual kidney function, improved quality of life, and reduced resource requirements. Despite these advantages, the global utilization of PD remains suboptimal, particularly in South Asia (SA), where a significant gap in PD delivery exists. This study aims to uncover the perceived barriers hindering PD utilization among nephrologists in SA. This is a cross-sectional survey involving 732 nephrologists from SA region. . The majority of respondents (44.7%) reported initiating less than six PD cases annually, reflecting low PD utilization. Cost and financial reimbursement policies emerged as major barriers, with 44.3% considering PD more expensive than haemodialysis (HD). Accessibility, negative attitudes toward PD, and fear of complications were identified as critical factors influencing PD adoption. The study also highlighted variations in PD costs among SA countries, emphasizing the need for tailored health economic strategies. This analysis provides insights into the multifaceted challenges faced by SA nephrologists in promoting PD and underscores the importance of targeted interventions.
  2. Jasuja S, Gallieni M, Jha V, Vachharajani T, Bhalla AK, Tan J, et al.
    Nephrology (Carlton), 2023 Dec;28(12):672-681.
    PMID: 37697492 DOI: 10.1111/nep.14236
    AIM: This cross-sectional survey aimed to determine the prevalence of Interventional Nephrology (IN) practice amongst nephrologists in the Asia-Pacific Region (APR), specifically related to dialysis access (DA).

    METHODS: The Association of VA and intervenTionAl Renal physicians (AVATAR) Foundation from India conducted a multinational online survey amongst nephrologists from the Asia-Pacific to determine the practice of IN in the planning, creation, and management of dialysis access. The treatment modalities, manpower and equipment availability, monthly cost of treatment, specifics of dialysis access interventions, and challenges in the training and practice of IN by nephrologists were included in the survey.

    RESULTS: Twenty-one countries from the APR participated in the survey. Nephrologists from 18 (85.7%) countries reported performing at least one of the basic dialysis access-related IN procedures, primarily the placement of non-tunnelled central catheters (n-TCC; 71.5%). Only 10 countries (47.6%) reported having an average of <4% of nephrologists performing any of the advanced IN access procedures, the most common being the placement of a peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter (20%). Lack of formal training (57.14%), time (42.8%), incentive (38%), institutional support (38%), medico-legal protection (28.6%), and prohibitive cost (23.8%) were the main challenges to practice IN. The primary obstacles to implementing the IN training were a lack of funding and skilled personnel.

    CONCLUSION: The practice of dialysis access-related IN in APR is inadequate, mostly due to a lack of training, backup support, and economic constraints, whereas training in access-related IN is constrained by a lack of a skilled workforce and finances.

Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links