METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted from June to December 2021. Institutions were selected via stratified random sampling and students via convenience sampling. A self-administered questionnaire comprising questions on socio-demographic characteristics, academic background, substance abuse, childhood abuse, religiosity and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 was used. Data were analysed using SPSS version 27; descriptive, point-biserial correlation, chi-square and multiple binary logistic regression analyses were conducted.
RESULTS: Sex and adverse childhood experiences significantly predicted all three MHDs (P<0.05). The students from public institutions (odds ratio [OR]=0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.56-0.90, P=0.004) had a lower risk of depression than those from private institutions. The smokers/vapers (OR=1.43, 95% CI=1.02-2.02, P=0.041) a higher risk of depression than the non-smokers/non-vapers. The social science students (OR=1.29, 95% CI= 1.01-1.65, P=0.039) had a higher risk of anxiety than the science students. The students who highly engaged in organisational religious activity (OR=0.91, 95% CI=0.84-0.98, P=0.015) had a lower risk of anxiety than their counterparts.
CONCLUSION: Anxiety is the commonest MHD among Malaysian youth, followed by depression and stress. Childhood abuse is a crucial related factor requiring further attention. Screening, surveillance, preventive measures and comprehensive interventions for MHDs should be initiated among youth.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A quantitative, cross-sectional design was employed in this study. Respondents were recruited from June to December 2021 among students attending higher education institutions in Malaysia. Institutions were sampled using stratified random sampling and the respondents were selected via convenience sampling. Data were collected via an online survey that inquired about respondents' socio-demographic characteristics, ACE, religiosity, knowledge on sexuality, attitude towards premarital sex, mental health status (MHS), and engagement in SRB. The data were analysed using SPSS version 27 for descriptive analysis, and SPSS AMOS version 27 for structural equation modelling (SEM) analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 1171 respondents were recruited in this study. From the SEM analysis, the proposed model indicated a good fit, and it explained 26% of the SRB variance. There was a partial mediation effect of the relationship between ACE on SRB through MHS (p<0.05), as well as religiosity on SRB through MHS (p<0.05). There was no significant mediation effect was found for the other variables.
CONCLUSION: This study highlighted the mediation effect of MHS between ACE on SRB, as well as between religiosity and SRB. Apart from addressing ACE and religiosity of the young adults, MHS should also need to be explored when dealing with SRB issues and vice versa. Preventive measures should be considered at younger stage to prevent high risk behaviour among young adults.