Displaying all 7 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Thinkhamrop J, Turner T, Subramaniam S, SEA-ORCHID Study Group
    Health Res Policy Syst, 2009 May 08;7:9.
    PMID: 19422715 DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-9
    Recognising the potential of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to improve practice, one of the strategies of the SEA-ORCHID project was to facilitate the development of evidence-based CPGs, and to support clinical staff in each of the four countries to build their skills in development of CPGs in the nine participating hospitals in Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines and Indonesia. This study was undertaken to investigate the impact of the SEA-ORCHID project on development of evidence-based CPGs.
  2. Short J, McDonald S, Turner T, Martis R, SEA-ORCHID Study Group
    BMC Med Educ, 2010;10:37.
    PMID: 20492706 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-37
    Fellowships are a component of many professional education programs. They provide opportunities to develop skills and competencies in an environment where time is protected and resources and technical support are more readily available. The SEA-ORCHID fellowships program aimed to increase capacity for evidence-based practice and research synthesis, and to encourage fellows to become leaders in these areas.
  3. SEA-ORCHID Study Group, Lumbiganon P, McDonald SJ, Laopaiboon M, Turner T, Green S, et al.
    PLoS One, 2011;6(9):e23994.
    PMID: 21915274 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023994
    BACKGROUND: Maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity remain unacceptably high in many low and middle income countries. SEA-ORCHID was a five year international collaborative project in South East Asia which aimed to determine whether health care and health outcomes for mothers and babies could be improved by developing capacity for research generation, synthesis and use.

    METHODS: Nine hospitals in Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Thailand participated in SEA-ORCHID. These hospitals were supported by researchers from three Australian centres. Health care practices and outcomes were assessed for 1000 women at each hospital both before and after the intervention. The capacity development intervention was tailored to the needs and context of each hospital and delivered over an 18 month period. Main outcomes included adherence to forms of care likely to be beneficial and avoidance of forms of care likely to be ineffective or harmful.

    RESULTS: We observed substantial variation in clinical practice change between sites. The capacity development intervention had a positive impact on some care practices across all countries, including increased family support during labour and decreased perineal shaving before birth, but in some areas there was no significant change in practice and a few beneficial practices were followed less often.

    CONCLUSION: The results of SEA-ORCHID demonstrate that investing in developing capacity for research use, synthesis and generation can lead to improvements in maternal and neonatal health practice and highlight the difficulty of implementing evidence-based practice change.

  4. Isa MN, Boyd E, Turner TL, Tolmie J, Connor JM
    PMID: 8629150
    The chromosome in situ suppression hybridization or chromosome painting technic was applied to confirm and eliminate the markers involving chromosome 21 segments using a chromosome 21 DNA library. The library ATCCLL21SNO2 was amplified, directly biotinylated using the polymerase chain reaction. The results demonstrated a translocation of chromosome 21 material on chromosome 2 and X and eliminate the origin of the marker. Thus, the technique provides an important tool to complement the conventional G-banding technic.
  5. Meteku BT, De Silva K, Green SE, Turner T
    J Clin Epidemiol, 2025 Jan 30;180:111707.
    PMID: 39892522 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111707
    OBJECTIVES: Evidence-based clinical guidelines have the potential to improve health care and health outcomes. Living guidelines methods provide an approach to ensuring guidelines are always up-to-date, maximizing this potential. However, to date, most work on living guidelines has been conducted in high income countries. The objective of this study is to explore the barriers and facilitators to the development, adaptation, and use of living guidelines among evidence-based guideline developers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

    STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We used a descriptive qualitative study design. We employed purposive and snowball sampling techniques to recruit guideline developers from LMICs and World Health Organization offices to participate in online, semistructured interviews. Data were analysed using a thematic approach with NVivo 20 software. Ethics approval was granted by Monash University.

    RESULTS: We interviewed 18 participants from LMICs (Colombia, India, Iran, Indonesia, Argentina, and Malaysia) and WHO offices (including headquarters, regional offices, and country offices). Two main themes emerged, along with six associated subthemes. The main themes were as follows: (1) People in LMICs want living guidelines and (2) Resource limitations and their implications for living guidelines in LMICs.

    CONCLUSION: Our research identified that guideline developers in LMICs have a strong desire to both develop and use living guidelines, but are currently limited by important barriers. Initiatives to support development, adaptation, and use of living guidelines in LMICs may help overcome barriers and meet the need for living guidelines in LMICs. It is also essential to design strategies that overcome identified barriers to developing, adapting, and implementing living guidelines, such as a lack of resources, delays in updates, and limited accessibility.

    PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This study looked at how living (continuously updated) approaches can be used to develop, adapt, and use clinical guidelines in settings with limited resources, and explored the pros and cons of each. The findings revealed a strong need to develop and use living guidelines in low-resource settings despite challenges, such as resource scarcity, delays in updating, and limited access to these guidelines. Overall, the findings revealed that living guidelines were worthwhile in LMICs despite all of the related challenges.

  6. Ho JJ, Pattanittum P, Japaraj RP, Turner T, Swadpanich U, Crowther CA, et al.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2010 Oct;111(1):13-8.
    PMID: 20598690 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.04.035
    OBJECTIVE: To examine episiotomy practices before and after a multi-component intervention designed to support the use and generation of research evidence in maternal and neonatal health care.

    METHODS: Set in 9 centers across 4 Southeast Asian countries, a retrospective survey was performed for 12 recommended pregnancy/childbirth practices and 13 outcomes of women in each center before and after intervention. Qualitative interviews were conducted to assess staff awareness and experience in evidence-based practice.

    RESULTS: There were significant decreases in the rate of episiotomy, from 64.1% to 60.1% (risk difference [RD] -4.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], -5.8 to -2.2) for all women and from 92.2% to 80.7% (RD -11.5; 95% CI, -13.4 to -9.6) for nulliparous women. Severe trauma decreased from 3.9% to 1.9% (RD -2.0; 95% CI, -2.7 to -1.4) for all women and from 6.7% to 3.0% (RD -3.7; 95% CI, -4.9 to -2.5) for nulliparous women. The frequency of intact perineum increased from 12.4% to 15.6% (RD 3.2; 95% CI, 1.9-4.6) for all women and from 1.7% to 8.0% (RD 6.3; 95% CI, 5.0-7.5) for nulliparous women.

    CONCLUSION: An intervention based on understanding and using the best available evidence can result in significant improvements in care and health outcomes.

  7. McDonald S, Turner T, Chamberlain C, Lumbiganon P, Thinkhamrop J, Festin MR, et al.
    PMID: 20594325 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-61
    Rates of maternal and perinatal mortality remain high in developing countries despite the existence of effective interventions. Efforts to strengthen evidence-based approaches to improve health in these settings are partly hindered by restricted access to the best available evidence, limited training in evidence-based practice and concerns about the relevance of existing evidence. South East Asia--Optimising Reproductive and Child Health in Developing Countries (SEA-ORCHID) was a five-year project that aimed to determine whether a multifaceted intervention designed to strengthen the capacity for research synthesis, evidence-based care and knowledge implementation improved clinical practice and led to better health outcomes for mothers and babies. This paper describes the development and design of the SEA-ORCHID intervention plan using a logical framework approach.
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links