OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the current local anaesthetic practice (general anaesthesia versus regional anaesthesia (RA)) in hip fracture surgery and to analyse their associations with perioperative outcomes.
METHODOLOGY: A retrospective observational study of hip fracture patients from April to December 2017 was undertaken. Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes were analysed against the types of anaesthesia using multiple logistic regression.
RESULTS: One hundred and twelve out of 154 patients (72.7%) had a general anaesthesia. Patients from residential care facilities were more likely to receive general anaesthesia (OR = 2.9, 95% CI: 1.1, 7.4; P = 0.03). There was no significant association between type of anaesthesia and specific postoperative outcomes; however, patients with postoperative delirium and hypotension were more likely to have received general anaesthesia [OR = 1.7, 95% CI: 0.68, 4.38; P = 0.25] and [OR = 1.6, 95% CI: 0.67, 4.04; P = 0.27] respectively). Subgroup analysis showed increased length of stay with patients who underwent general anaesthesia (OR = 1.26, 95% CI:1.04, 1.54; P = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Regional anaesthesia may be considered in patients without contraindications in view of increased risk of postoperative delirium and hypotension, and longer length of stay with general anaesthesia. A larger prospective study is needed to confirm these findings.
OBJECTIVES: Using diffusion tensor cardiac magnetic resonance (DT-CMR) we assessed myocardial disarray and fibrosis in both SARC+LVH- and HCM patients and evaluated the relationship between microstructural alterations and electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters associated with arrhythmic risk.
METHODS: Sixty-two individuals (24 SARC+LVH-, 24 HCM and 14 matched controls) were evaluated with multiparametric CMR including stimulated echo acquisition mode (STEAM) DT-CMR, and blinded quantitative 12-lead ECG analysis.
RESULTS: Mean diastolic fractional anisotropy (FA) was reduced in HCM compared to SARC+LVH- and controls (0.49±0.05 vs 0.52±0.04 vs 0.53±0.04, p=0.009), even after adjustment for differences in extracellular volume (ECV) (p=0.038). Both HCM and SARC+LVH- had segments with significantly reduced FA relative to controls (54% vs 25% vs 0%, p=0.002). Multiple repolarization parameters were prolonged in HCM and SARC+LVH-, with corrected JT interval (JTc) being most significant (354±42ms vs 356±26ms vs 314±26ms, p=0.002). Among SARC+LVH-, JTc duration correlated negatively with mean FA (r=-0.6, p=0.002). In HCM, the JTc interval showed a stronger association with ECV (r=0.6 p=0.019) than FA (r=-0.1 p=0.72). JTc discriminated SARC+LVH- from controls (Area-under-the-receiver-operator-curve 0.88, CI 0.76-1.00, p<0.001), and in HCM correlated with the ESC HCM sudden cardiac death risk score (r=0.5, p=0.014).
CONCLUSION: Low diastolic FA, suggestive of myocardial disarray, is present in both SARC+LVH- and HCM. Low FA and raised ECV were associated with repolarization prolongation. Myocardial disarray assessment using DT-CMR and repolarization parameters such as the JTc interval demonstrate significant potential as markers of disease activity in HCM.