Displaying all 5 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Du ST, Yang YW, Wu TF
    Trop Biomed, 2025 Mar 01;42(1):61-64.
    PMID: 40163406 DOI: 10.47665/tb.42.1.011
    To investigate the seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in patients with malignant tumors, we aimed to provide insights into improving the prognosis and quality of life of these patients. A total of 721 patients with malignant tumors admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Dali University from November 2020 to May 2022, along with 100 healthy volunteers from the hospital during the same period, were enrolled. Demographic data and serum samples were collected, and serum-specific IgG and IgM antibodies against T. gondii were detected using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Patients were considered positive for T. gondii infection if either IgG or IgM antibodies were detected. The seroprevalence of specific IgG and IgM antibodies was compared between patients with malignant tumors and healthy volunteers. The positivity rates for anti-T. gondii antibodies in patients with malignant tumors was significantly higher than that in healthy volunteers (31.2% vs. 13.0%; χ2 = 14.141, P < 0.01). Pairwise comparisons revealed that the positive rates of serum anti-T. gondii antibodies in patients with various types of malignant tumors were significantly higher than those in healthy volunteers (all P values < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the average age and sex composition between patients with malignant tumors and healthy volunteers (P > 0.05). The results indicate a high seroprevalence rate of T. gondii infections among patients with malignant tumors, which was significantly higher than that among healthy volunteers.
  2. Huang CB, Xiao L, Xing SC, Chen JY, Yang YW, Zhou Y, et al.
    BMC Genomics, 2019 Oct 23;20(1):770.
    PMID: 31646963 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-6115-1
    BACKGROUND: Host genotype plays a crucial role in microbial composition of laying hens, which may lead to dissimilar odor gas production. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship among layer breed, microbial structure and odor production.

    RESULTS: Thirty Hy-Line Gray and thirty Lohmann Pink laying hens were used in this study to determine the impact of cecal microbial structure on odor production of laying hens. The hens were managed under the same husbandry and dietary regimes. Results of in vivo experiments showed a lower hydrogen sulfide (H2S) production from Hy-Line hens and a lower concentration of soluble sulfide (S2-) but a higher concentration of butyrate in the cecal content of the Hy-Line hens compared to Lohmann Pink hens (P  0.05). Significant microbial structural differences existed between the two breed groups. The relative abundance of some butyrate producers (including Butyricicoccus, Butyricimonas and Roseburia) and sulfate-reducing bacteria (including Mailhella and Lawsonia) were found to be significantly correlated with odor production and were shown to be different in the 16S rRNA and PCR data between two breed groups. Furthermore, some bacterial metabolism pathways associated with energy extraction and carbohydrate utilization (oxidative phosphorylation, pyruvate metabolism, energy metabolism, two component system and secretion system) were overrepresented in the Hy-Line hens, while several amino acid metabolism-associated pathways (amino acid related enzymes, arginine and proline metabolism, and alanine-aspartate and glutamate metabolism) were more prevalent in the Lohmann hens.

    CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that genotype of laying hens influence cecal microbiota, which in turn modulates their odor production. Our study provides references for breeding and enteric manipulation for defined microbiota to reduce odor gas emission.

  3. Urbina-Blanco CA, Jilani SZ, Speight IR, Bojdys MJ, Friščić T, Stoddart JF, et al.
    Nat Chem, 2020 Sep;12(9):773-776.
    PMID: 32807887 DOI: 10.1038/s41557-020-0529-x
  4. Urbina-Blanco CA, Jilani SZ, Speight IR, Bojdys MJ, Friščić T, Stoddart JF, et al.
    J Am Chem Soc, 2020 Aug 26;142(34):14393-14396.
    PMID: 32803980 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c07877
  5. Urbina-Blanco CA, Jilani SZ, Speight IR, Bojdys MJ, Friščić T, Stoddart JF, et al.
    Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2020 Oct 12;59(42):18306-18310.
    PMID: 33448562 DOI: 10.1002/anie.202009834
    Valuing diversity leads to scientific excellence, the progress of science and most importantly, it is simply the right thing to do. We can value diversity not only in words, but also in actions.
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links