Displaying all 5 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Sowtali SN, Yusoff DM, Harith S, Mohamed M
    J Arrhythm, 2016 Apr;32(2):112-8.
    PMID: 27092192 DOI: 10.1016/j.joa.2015.10.003
    To date, there is a lack of published studies on assessment tools to evaluate the effectiveness of stroke education programs.
  2. Tan MC, Tan JL, Lee WJ, Srivathsan K, Sorajja D, El Masry H, et al.
    J Arrhythm, 2023 Oct;39(5):784-789.
    PMID: 37799789 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12898
    BACKGROUND: Real-world clinical data on the adverse events related to the use of cryoballoon catheter for pulmonary vein isolation remains limited.

    OBJECTIVE: To report and describe the adverse events related to the use of Artic Front cryoballoon catheters (Arctic Front, Arctic Front Advance, and Arctic Front Advance Pro) reported in the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Manufacturers and User Defined Experience (MAUDE) database.

    METHODS: We reviewed all the adverse events reported to the FDA MAUDE database over a 10.7-year study period from January 01, 2011 to September 31, 2021. All events were independently reviewed by two physicians.

    RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 320 procedural-related adverse events reported in the MAUDE database were identified. The most common adverse event was transient or persistent phrenic nerve palsy (PNP), accounting for 48% of all events. This was followed by cardiac perforation (15%), pulmonary vein stenosis (8%), transient ischemic attack or stroke (6%), vascular injury (4%), transient or persistent ST-elevation myocardial infarction (3%), hemoptysis (2%), pericarditis (2%), and esophageal ulcer or fistula (1%). There were six reported intra-procedural death events as a result of cardiac perforation.

    CONCLUSION: The two most common procedural adverse events associated with cryoballoon ablation were PNP and cardiac perforation. All cases of procedural mortality were due to cardiac perforation.

  3. Kim YH, Shim J, Tsai CT, Wang CC, Vilela G, Muengtaweepongsa S, et al.
    J Arrhythm, 2018 Aug;34(4):418-427.
    PMID: 30167013 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12073
    BACKGROUND: ROCKET AF and its East Asian subanalysis demonstrated that rivaroxaban was non-inferior to warfarin for stroke/systemic embolism (SE) prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), with a favorable benefit-risk profile. XANAP investigated the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in routine care in Asia-Pacific.

    METHODS: XANAP was a prospective, real-world, observational study in patients with NVAF newly starting rivaroxaban. Patients were followed at ~3-month intervals for 1 year, or for ≥30 days after permanent discontinuation. Primary outcomes were major bleeding events, adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included stroke/SE. Major outcomes were adjudicated centrally.

    RESULTS: XANAP enrolled 2273 patients from 10 countries: mean age was 70.5 years and 58.1% were male. 49.8% of patients received rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (od), 43.8% 15 mg od and 5.9% 10 mg od. Mean treatment duration was 296 days, and 72.8% of patients had received prior anticoagulation therapy. Co-morbidities included heart failure (20.1%), hypertension (73.6%), diabetes mellitus (26.6%), prior stroke/non-central nervous system SE/transient ischemic attack (32.8%) and myocardial infarction (3.8%). Mean CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 2.3, 3.7 and 2.1, respectively. The rates (events/100 patient-years [95% confidence interval]) of treatment-emergent major bleeding, stroke and all-cause mortality were 1.5 (1.0-2.1), 1.7 (1.2-2.5) and 2.0 (1.4-2.7), respectively. Persistence was 66.2% at the study end.

    CONCLUSIONS: The real-world XANAP study demonstrated low rates of stroke and bleeding in rivaroxaban-treated patients with NVAF from Asia-Pacific. The results were consistent with the real-world XANTUS study and ROCKET AF.

  4. Mohd Said MR, Gian Singh SS, Lee KT, Khor LM, Chea CY, Silveraju AR, et al.
    J Arrhythm, 2021 Feb;37(1):251-253.
    PMID: 33664912 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12485
    Our case illustrated zero-fluoroscopic approach on AVNRT ablation in a pregnant lady.
  5. Chun KRJ, Okumura K, Scazzuso F, Keun On Y, Kueffer FJ, Braegelmann KM, et al.
    J Arrhythm, 2021 Apr;37(2):356-367.
    PMID: 33850577 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12504
    BACKGROUND: Cryoballoon ablation is a commonly used approach to treat patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

    OBJECTIVES: Report on the safety and efficacy of cryoballoon ablation for the treatment of AF in the largest global cohort of cryoablated patients prospectively studied within a single registry.

    METHODS: The Cryo AF Global Registry is a prospective, multi-center registry. Patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) or persistent AF (PsAF) were treated with the cryoballoon catheter according to routine practices at 93 sites across 36 countries. Primary efficacy endpoints included freedom from AF and freedom from AF/atrial flutter (AFL)/atrial tachycardia (AT) ≥30 seconds. The primary safety endpoint was serious device- or procedure-related adverse events over 12 month follow-up.

    RESULTS: During this evaluation window, 2922 subjects completed an index cryoballoon procedure, and 1440 completed 12 month follow-up. The cohort was 61 ± 12 years of age, 36.3% female, and 78.7% PAF. Serious device- and procedure-related adverse event rates were 1.5% and 3.4%, respectively. Freedom from AF/AFL/AT after the 90 day blanking period was 86.4% (95% CI: 84.3%-88.3%) in patients with PAF and 70.9% (95% CI: 64.6%-76.4%) in patients with PsAF. Freedom from AF/AFL/AT in first-line PAF and PsAF was 90.0% (95% CI: 86.4%-92.7%) and 72.9% (95% CI: 58.6%-83.0%) at 12 months, respectively.

    CONCLUSIONS: The Cryo Global AF Registry is the largest evaluation to demonstrate cryoablation is an efficient, safe, and effective treatment for patients with AF worldwide. Cryoablation was commonly used to treat patients prior to an AAD failure and may facilitate earlier therapy for patients on the AF disease continuum.

Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links