Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Arizona Phoenix Arizona USA
  • 2 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
  • 3 International Medical University Kuala Lumpur Malaysia
  • 4 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA
J Arrhythm, 2023 Oct;39(5):784-789.
PMID: 37799789 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12898

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Real-world clinical data on the adverse events related to the use of cryoballoon catheter for pulmonary vein isolation remains limited.

OBJECTIVE: To report and describe the adverse events related to the use of Artic Front cryoballoon catheters (Arctic Front, Arctic Front Advance, and Arctic Front Advance Pro) reported in the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Manufacturers and User Defined Experience (MAUDE) database.

METHODS: We reviewed all the adverse events reported to the FDA MAUDE database over a 10.7-year study period from January 01, 2011 to September 31, 2021. All events were independently reviewed by two physicians.

RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 320 procedural-related adverse events reported in the MAUDE database were identified. The most common adverse event was transient or persistent phrenic nerve palsy (PNP), accounting for 48% of all events. This was followed by cardiac perforation (15%), pulmonary vein stenosis (8%), transient ischemic attack or stroke (6%), vascular injury (4%), transient or persistent ST-elevation myocardial infarction (3%), hemoptysis (2%), pericarditis (2%), and esophageal ulcer or fistula (1%). There were six reported intra-procedural death events as a result of cardiac perforation.

CONCLUSION: The two most common procedural adverse events associated with cryoballoon ablation were PNP and cardiac perforation. All cases of procedural mortality were due to cardiac perforation.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.