A giant retinal tear (GRT) is a full-thickness neurosensory retinal break that extends circumferentially around the retina for three or more clock hours in the presence of a posteriorly detached vitreous. Its incidence in large population-based studies has been estimated as 1.5% of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments, with a significant male preponderance, and bilaterality in 12.8%. Most GRTs are idiopathic, with trauma, hereditary vitreoretinopathies and high myopia each being causative in decreasing frequency. The vast majority of GRTs are currently managed with a pars plana vitrectomy; the use of adjunctive circumferential scleral buckling is debated, but no studies have shown a clear anatomical or visual advantage with its use. Similarly, silicone oil tamponade does not influence long-term outcomes when compared with gas. Primary and final retinal reattachment rates are achieved in 88% and 95% of patients, respectively. Even when the retina remains attached, however, visual recovery may be limited. Furthermore, fellow eyes of patients with a GRT are at higher risk of developing retinal tears and retinal detachment. Prophylactic treatment under these circumstances may be considered but there is no firm evidence of its efficacy at the present time.
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections have revolutionized the field of ophthalmology, and their use in a variety of retinal diseases is growing. One target disease is peripheral exudative hemorrhagic chorioretinopathy, a disease that is uncommon and poorly understood. Despite this, there are numerous studies and case reports outlining the potential role of intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF medicines to treat it. As such, an evidence-based understanding of its risk-benefit profile is vital. We performed a comprehensive search in the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases for published studies and case reports relating to the use of anti-VEGF injections in peripheral exudative hemorrhagic chorioretinopathy. Anti-VEGF was first used in 2010 to aid in the management of peripheral exudative hemorrhagic chorioretinopathy. Since then, it has been increasingly used to manage this disease. Other potential management strategies, including laser photocoagulation, cryotherapy, photodynamic therapy, and vitrectomy are explored and compared with anti-VEGF where possible. Anti-VEGF appears to be an effective therapy in managing peripheral exudative hemorrhagic chorioretinopathy, especially when there is an exudative threat to the macula.