Affiliations 

  • 1 South Australian Institute of Ophthalmology, The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Electronic address: akashgowd@gmail.com
  • 2 South Australian Institute of Ophthalmology, The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  • 3 Tun Hussein Onn National Eye Hospital, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
Surv Ophthalmol, 2024;69(2):173-178.
PMID: 37806565 DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2023.10.004

Abstract

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections have revolutionized the field of ophthalmology, and their use in a variety of retinal diseases is growing. One target disease is peripheral exudative hemorrhagic chorioretinopathy, a disease that is uncommon and poorly understood. Despite this, there are numerous studies and case reports outlining the potential role of intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF medicines to treat it. As such, an evidence-based understanding of its risk-benefit profile is vital. We performed a comprehensive search in the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases for published studies and case reports relating to the use of anti-VEGF injections in peripheral exudative hemorrhagic chorioretinopathy. Anti-VEGF was first used in 2010 to aid in the management of peripheral exudative hemorrhagic chorioretinopathy. Since then, it has been increasingly used to manage this disease. Other potential management strategies, including laser photocoagulation, cryotherapy, photodynamic therapy, and vitrectomy are explored and compared with anti-VEGF where possible. Anti-VEGF appears to be an effective therapy in managing peripheral exudative hemorrhagic chorioretinopathy, especially when there is an exudative threat to the macula.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.