Displaying all 4 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Ali RH, Alateeqi M, Jama H, Alrumaidhi N, Alqallaf A, Mohammed EM, et al.
    J Clin Pathol, 2023 Feb;76(2):103-110.
    PMID: 34489310 DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2021-207876
    AIMS: Accurate assessment of 1p/19q codeletion status in diffuse gliomas is of paramount importance for diagnostic, prognostic and predictive purposes. While targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) has been widely implemented for glioma molecular profiling, its role in detecting structural chromosomal variants is less well established, requiring supplementary informatic tools for robust detection. Herein, we evaluated a commercially available amplicon-based targeted NGS panel (Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v3) for the detection of 1p/19q losses in glioma tissues using an Ion Torrent platform and the standard built-in NGS data analysis pipeline solely.

    METHODS: Using as little as 20 ng of DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues, we analysed 25 previously characterised gliomas for multi-locus copy number losses (CNLs) on 1p and 19q, including 11 oligodendrogliomas (ODG) and 14 non-oligodendroglial (non-ODG) controls. Fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) was used as a reference standard.

    RESULTS: The software confidently detected combined contiguous 1p/19q CNLs in 11/11 ODGs (100% sensitivity), using a copy number cut-off of ≤1.5 and a minimum of 10 amplicons covering the regions. Only partial non-specific losses were identified in non-ODGs (100% specificity). Copy number averages of ODG and non-ODG groups were significantly different (p<0.001). NGS was concordant with FISH and was superior to it in distinguishing partial from contiguous losses indicative of whole-arm chromosomal deletion.

    CONCLUSIONS: This commercial NGS panel, along with the standard Ion Torrent algorithm, accurately detected 1p/19q losses in ODG samples, obviating the need for specialised custom-made informatic analyses. This can easily be incorporated into routine glioma workflow as an alternative to FISH.

    Matched MeSH terms: Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1/genetics
  2. Kong PL, Cheah PL, Mun KS, Chiew SF, Lau TP, Koh CC, et al.
    Malays J Pathol, 2020 Dec;42(3):369-376.
    PMID: 33361717
    Together with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation, co-deletion of 1p19q (1p19q codel) is a prerequisite for diagnosis of oligodendroglioma, making it imperative that histopathology laboratories introduce testing for 1p19q codel. To date there is still no consensus reference range and cut-offs that confirm deletion of 1p or 19q. We embarked on determining our reference range in 11 formalinfixed, paraffin-embedded non-neoplastic brain tissue using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with the Vysis 1p36/1q25 and 19q13/19p13 FISH Probe Kit (Abbott Molecular Inc., USA). At same time we attempted to validate our methodology in 13 histologically-confirmed IDH-mutant oligodendrogliomas. For 1p, percentage cells with deletion (range=8-23%; mean±SD = 15.73±5.50%) and target: control (1p36:1q25) ratio (range = 0.89-0.96; mean±SD = 0.92±0.03) in non-neoplastic brain, differed significantly (p<0.000) from oligodendroglioma (percentage cells with deletion: range = 49-100%; mean±SD = 82.46±15.21%; target:control ratio range:0.50-0.76; mean±SD = 0.59±0.08). For 19q, percentage cells with deletion (range = 7-20%; mean±SD = 12.00±3.49%) and target:control (19q13/19p13) ratio (range:0.90-0.97; mean±SD = 0.94±0.02) in non-neoplastic brain also differed significantly from oligodendroglioma (percentage cells with deletion: range = 45-100%; mean±SD = 82.62±18.13%; target:control ratio range:0.50-0.78; mean±SD = 0.59±0.09). Using recommended calculation method, for diagnosis of 1p deletion, percentage of cells showing deletion should be >32-33% and/or target:control ratio <0.83. For 19q, percentage of cells showing deletion should be >22% and target:control ratio <0.88. Using these cut-offs all 13 oligodendroglioma demonstrated 1p19q codel.
    Matched MeSH terms: Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1/genetics*
  3. Zhang M, Wang Z, Obazee O, Jia J, Childs EJ, Hoskins J, et al.
    Oncotarget, 2016 Oct 11;7(41):66328-66343.
    PMID: 27579533 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.11041
    Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified common pancreatic cancer susceptibility variants at 13 chromosomal loci in individuals of European descent. To identify new susceptibility variants, we performed imputation based on 1000 Genomes (1000G) Project data and association analysis using 5,107 case and 8,845 control subjects from 27 cohort and case-control studies that participated in the PanScan I-III GWAS. This analysis, in combination with a two-staged replication in an additional 6,076 case and 7,555 control subjects from the PANcreatic Disease ReseArch (PANDoRA) and Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control (PanC4) Consortia uncovered 3 new pancreatic cancer risk signals marked by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs2816938 at chromosome 1q32.1 (per allele odds ratio (OR) = 1.20, P = 4.88x10 -15), rs10094872 at 8q24.21 (OR = 1.15, P = 3.22x10 -9) and rs35226131 at 5p15.33 (OR = 0.71, P = 1.70x10 -8). These SNPs represent independent risk variants at previously identified pancreatic cancer risk loci on chr1q32.1 ( NR5A2), chr8q24.21 ( MYC) and chr5p15.33 ( CLPTM1L- TERT) as per analyses conditioned on previously reported susceptibility variants. We assessed expression of candidate genes at the three risk loci in histologically normal ( n = 10) and tumor ( n = 8) derived pancreatic tissue samples and observed a marked reduction of NR5A2 expression (chr1q32.1) in the tumors (fold change -7.6, P = 5.7x10 -8). This finding was validated in a second set of paired ( n = 20) histologically normal and tumor derived pancreatic tissue samples (average fold change for three NR5A2 isoforms -31.3 to -95.7, P = 7.5x10 -4-2.0x10 -3). Our study has identified new susceptibility variants independently conferring pancreatic cancer risk that merit functional follow-up to identify target genes and explain the underlying biology.
    Matched MeSH terms: Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1/genetics*
  4. Li X, Xu A, Sheng H, Ting TH, Mao X, Huang X, et al.
    Pediatr Diabetes, 2018 03;19(2):251-258.
    PMID: 28791793 DOI: 10.1111/pedi.12560
    BACKGROUND: Sulfonylurea therapy can improve glycemic control and ameliorate neurodevelopmental outcomes in patients suffering from neonatal diabetes mellitus (NDM) with KCNJ11 or ABCC8 mutations. As genetic testing results are often delayed, it remains controversial whether sulfonylurea treatment should be attempted immediately at diagnosis or doctors should await genetic confirmation.

    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of sulfonylurea therapy in Chinese NDM patients during infancy before genetic testing results were available.

    METHODS: The medical records of NDM patients with their follow-up details were reviewed and molecular genetic analysis was performed. Sulfonylurea transfer regimens were applied in patients diagnosed after May 2010, and glycemic status and side effects were evaluated in each patient.

    RESULTS: There were 23 NDM patients from 22 unrelated families, 10 had KCNJ11 mutations, 3 harbored ABCC8 mutations, 1 had INS mutations, 4 had chromosome 6q24 abnormalities, 1 had a deletion at chromosome 1p36.23p36.12, and 4 had no genetic abnormality identified. Sixteen NDM infants were treated with glyburide at an average age of 49 days (range 14-120 days) before genetic confirmation. A total of 11 of 16 (69%) were able to successfully switch to glyburide with a more stable glucose profile. The responsive glyburide dose was 0.51 ± 0.16 mg/kg/d (0.3-0.8 mg/kg/d), while the maintenance dose was 0.30 ± 0.07 mg/kg/d (0.2-0.4 mg/kg/d). No serious adverse events were reported.

    CONCLUSIONS: Molecular genetic diagnosis is recommended in all patients with NDM. However, if genetic testing results are delayed, sulfonylurea therapy should be considered before such results are received, even in infants with newly diagnosed NDM.

    Matched MeSH terms: Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1/genetics
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links