Displaying all 3 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Fulltext A cost-effectiveness analysis of blended versus face-to-face delivery of evidence-based medicine to medical students
    Maloney S, Nicklen P, Rivers G, Foo J, Ooi YY, Reeves S, et al.
    J Med Internet Res, 2015;17(7):e182.
    PMID: 26197801 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4346
    Blended learning describes a combination of teaching methods, often utilizing digital technologies. Research suggests that learner outcomes can be improved through some blended learning formats. However, the cost-effectiveness of delivering blended learning is unclear.
    Matched MeSH terms: Competency-Based Education/economics
  2. Motives for intergenerational transfers: evidence from Malaysia
    Lillard LA, Willis RJ
    Demography, 1997 Feb;34(1):115-34.
    PMID: 9074835
    In this paper we discuss a number of hypotheses about motives for intergenerational transfers within the family. We use data on time and money transfers between generations in Malaysia, where there is neither Social Security nor Medicare, to explore these hypotheses empirically. We find evidence supporting the hypotheses that children are an important source of old age security and that old age security is, in part, children's repayment for parental investments in their education. This repayment is partly a function of the children's income and, in the case of females, a function of their spouse's income. We also find evidence supporting the hypotheses that parents and children engage in the exchange of time help for money.
    Matched MeSH terms: Education/economics*
  3. Expanding Access: Cost-effectiveness of Cochlear Implantation and Deaf Education in Asia
    Emmett SD, Sudoko CK, Tucci DL, Gong W, Saunders JE, Global HEAR (Hearing Loss Evaluation, Advocacy, and Research) Collaborative:, et al.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2019 10;161(4):672-682.
    PMID: 31210566 DOI: 10.1177/0194599819849917
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of cochlear implantation (CI) with mainstream education and deaf education with sign language for treatment of children with profound sensorineural hearing loss in low- and lower-middle income countries in Asia.

    STUDY DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis.

    SETTING: Bangladesh, Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, and Sri Lanka participated in the study.

    SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Costs were obtained from experts in each country with known costs and published data, with estimation when necessary. A disability-adjusted life-years model was applied with 3% discounting and 10-year length of analysis. A sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of device cost, professional salaries, annual number of implants, and probability of device failure. Cost-effectiveness was determined with the World Health Organization standard of cost-effectiveness ratio per gross domestic product (CER/GDP) per capita <3.

    RESULTS: Deaf education was cost-effective in all countries except Nepal (CER/GDP, 3.59). CI was cost-effective in all countries except Nepal (CER/GDP, 6.38) and Pakistan (CER/GDP, 3.14)-the latter of which reached borderline cost-effectiveness in the sensitivity analysis (minimum, maximum: 2.94, 3.39).

    CONCLUSION: Deaf education and CI are largely cost-effective in participating Asian countries. Variation in CI maintenance and education-related costs may contribute to the range of cost-effectiveness ratios observed in this study.

    Matched MeSH terms: Education/economics*
Related Terms
    Try searching for something
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links