METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted between November 2019 and November 2021 at seven tertiary hospitals in Malaysia. Participants registered with Malaysian Thalassemia Registry were recruited by convenience sampling. Adherence was measured via pill count and self-reported adherence. Knowledge about thalassemia and ICT was measured using a questionnaire from Modul Thalassemia by Ministry of Health of Malaysia. A decision tree was used to identify predictors of non-adherence.
RESULTS: A total of 135 patients were recruited. The prevalence of non-adherence to ICT in those who took subcutaneous ± oral medications was 47.5% (95% CI: 31.5%, 63.9%) and the prevalence of non-adherence to ICT in those who took oral medications only was 21.1% (95% CI: 13.4%, 30.6%). The median knowledge score was 67.5% (IQR 15%). A decision tree has identified two factors associated with non-adherence. They were ICT's route of administration and knowledge score. Out of 100 patients who were on oral medications only, 79 were expected to adhere. Out of 100 patients who were on subcutaneous ± oral medications and scored less than 56.25% in knowledge questionnaire, 86 were expected to non-adhere. Based on the logistic regression, the odds of non-adherence in patients who took oral medications only was 71% lower than the odds of non-adherence in patients who took subcutaneous ± oral medications (OR = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.13, 0.65; p = .002).
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of non-adherence to ICT among children with beta thalassemia major in Malaysia was 20/95 (21.1%) in those who took oral medications only and the prevalence of non-adherence was 19/40 (47.5%) in those who took subcutaneous ± oral medications. The factors associated with non-adherence were ICT's route of administration and knowledge score.
METHODS: The open-label, Phase II ECLIPSE study evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in transfusion-dependent thalassemia or lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes patients randomized 1:1 to receive deferasirox DT or FCT over 24 weeks as a secondary outcome of the study. Three PRO questionnaires were developed to evaluate both deferasirox formulations: 1) Modified Satisfaction with Iron Chelation Therapy Questionnaire; 2) Palatability Questionnaire; 3) Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptom Diary.
RESULTS: One hundred seventy three patients were enrolled; 87 received the FCT and 86 the DT formulation. FCT recipients consistently reported better adherence (easier to take medication, less bothered by time to prepare medication and waiting time before eating), greater satisfaction/preference (general satisfaction and with administration of medicine), and fewer concerns (less worry about not swallowing enough medication, fewer limitations in daily activities, less concern about side effects). FCT recipients reported no taste or aftertaste and could swallow all their medicine with an acceptable amount of liquid. GI summary scores were low for both formulations.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a preference in favor of the deferasirox FCT formulation regardless of underlying disease or age group. Better patient satisfaction and adherence to chelation therapy may reduce iron overload-related complications.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02125877; registered April 26, 2014.