Displaying all 7 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Ong S, Ng WH
    Med J Malaysia, 1979 Sep;34(1):86-8.
    PMID: 542159
    Matched MeSH terms: Marfan Syndrome/diagnosis*; Marfan Syndrome/therapy
  2. Alam MK, Alfawzan AA, Shrivastava D, Srivastava KC, Alswairki HJ, Mussallam S, et al.
    PMID: 35564443 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095048
    This meta-analysis aimed to compare Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients with non-MFS populations based on orofacial health status to combine publicly available scientific information while also improving the validity of primary study findings. A comprehensive search was performed in the following databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Medline, and Web of Science, for articles published between 1 January 2000 and 17 February 2022. PRISMA guidelines were followed to carry out this systematic review. We used the PECO system to classify people with MFS based on whether or not they had distinctive oral health characteristics compared to the non-MFS population. The following are some examples of how PECO is used: P denotes someone who has MFS; E stands for a medical or genetic assessment of MFS; C stands for people who do not have MFS; and O stands for the orofacial characteristics of MFS. Using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, independent reviewers assessed the articles' methodological quality and extracted data. Four case-control studies were analyzed for meta-analysis. Due to the wide range of variability, we were only able to include data from at least three previous studies. There was a statistically significant difference in bleeding on probing and pocket depth between MFS and non-MFS subjects. MFS patients are more prone to periodontal tissue inflammation due to the activity of FBN1 and MMPs. Early orthodontic treatment is beneficial for the correction of a narrow upper jaw and a high palate, as well as a skeletal class II with retrognathism of the lower jaw and crowding of teeth.
    Matched MeSH terms: Marfan Syndrome*
  3. Soehardy Z, Yuhanisa A, Thein SS, Rohana AG, Fauzi AR, Norlinah MI, et al.
    Med J Malaysia, 2005 Dec;60(5):655-6.
    PMID: 16515122
    We report a 40-year-old man who has Marfan's syndrome and was recently diagnosed to have pulmonary tuberculosis when he presented with chronic cough. He was admitted with bilateral lower limb weakness which was ascending in nature. He eventually required ventilation. It was initially thought to be isoniazid-neuropathy. However, stopping the drug did not improve the condition and the patient developed bilateral lower motor neuron 7th cranial nerve palsy. Nerve conduction, MRI and CSF studies were done to confirm a first case report of AMSAN variant progressing to CIDP in a patient with Marfan's syndrome and pulmonary tuberculosis.
    Matched MeSH terms: Marfan Syndrome/complications*
  4. Tai YS
    Med J Malaysia, 1986 Sep;41(3):233-5.
    PMID: 3670140
    A patient with marfanoid habitus was admitted to the General Hospital, Kuala Lumpur in October 1985 for surgical closure of an atrial septal defect. He was suspected to have Marfan Syndrome but there was no involvement of the aorta nor the eye. The clinical features were intermediate between that of the Marfan Syndrome and the Ehler's Danlos Syndrome. It is suggested that this could be a separate distinct entity within the heritable disorders of connective tissue known as the Marfanoid Hypermobility Syndrome.
    Matched MeSH terms: Marfan Syndrome/diagnosis*
  5. Peng LH, Perumal R
    Med J Malaysia, 1976 Mar;30(3):213-9.
    PMID: 985681
    Matched MeSH terms: Marfan Syndrome/complications
  6. Yap WF, Chong HC
    Int J Rheum Dis, 2020 Nov;23(11):1568-1573.
    PMID: 32969582 DOI: 10.1111/1756-185X.13965
    FBN1 gene encodes for the connective tissue protein fibrillin-1 which can also regulate the profibrotic cytokine transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß1. Mutations in the FBN1 gene cause Marfan syndrome (MFS), a genetic condition with defective connective tissues. FBN1 haplotypes and single nucleotide polymorphisms have also been reported to be associated with systemic sclerosis (SSc), a connective tissue disease characterized by fibrosis of multiple organs. Furthermore, the duplication of the Fbn1 gene causes a SSc-like disease in the TsK1 mouse model. To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports of MFS and SSc co-existing in a patient. Here, we describe a 46-year-old woman who presented with cardiac failure. She had a family history of MFS. Physical examination revealed marfanoid habitus and scleroderma features. Echocardiography demonstrated dilated cardiomyopathy with aortic root dilatation, aortic regurgitation and mitral regurgitation. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was consistent with dilated cardiomyopathy, mid-wall fibrosis at basal septal wall and dilated aortic root. Extractable nuclear antigen panel detected anti-Scl 70. She fulfilled Ghent criteria for MFS and satisfied American College of Rheumatology/ European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for SSc. Although we do not have the FBN1 sequence in our patient, the co-existence of MFS and SSc in this patient raises the possibility of co-existence of distinct mutations in the FBN1 gene that could affect TGF-β signaling differently, resulting in divergent pathologic consequences - loss of structural integrity in MFS versus increased extracellular matrix deposition in SSc, and different clinical manifestations.
    Matched MeSH terms: Marfan Syndrome/complications*; Marfan Syndrome/diagnosis; Marfan Syndrome/genetics
  7. Zanjani KS, Wong AR, Sadiq M, Weber HS, Cutler NG
    Congenit Heart Dis, 2010 Sep-Oct;5(5):439-43.
    PMID: 21087429 DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2010.00448.x
    Objectives: There is little evidence in the medical literature about safety of PDA device closure and its effects on aortic root diameter in Marfan patients. We reported on nine Marfan patients whose ducts were occluded by coil or Amplatzer Duct Occluder.
    Patients and interventions: Two patients had aneurismal type E ducts which were closed by a single coil, respectively. The others had conical ducts for which even Amplatzer occluder, stiff, or double coils were used.
    Results: No untoward consequence was found during a median follow up period of 18.5 months (range 3 months to 6.33 years). Two patients had small residual shunts. The observed change in the mean ratio of aortic root diameter to its estimated value was statistically insignificant in seven patients who had complete data on their aortic root diameter before PDA closure and during the follow up.
    Conclusions: We concluded that PDA device closure in Marfan patients is safe. Risk of residual shunt is higher even after closure of small ducts.
    Matched MeSH terms: Marfan Syndrome/complications*; Marfan Syndrome/ultrasonography
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links