Cardiomyopathy developed in the peripartum period in two healthy primigravida at 41 and 42 weeks of gestation are presented. In the first case, the patient presented with pulmonary oedema and had cardiac arrest immediately after admission. After resuscitation, a live baby was delivered by Caesarean section. Second cardiac arrest occurred after 12 hours of operation and the patient was resuscitated again. On the 8th post operative day, patient died of D.I.V.C. and renal failure. The second case was a twin pregnancy associated with pregnancy induced hypertension. Caesarean section was performed for foetal distress. She developed pulmonary oedema with left ventricular failure on the second post operative day, was resuscitated and discharged on the 15th day. These are the first two cases to be reported from Hospital University Sains Malaysia. Reference is made to three other cases in which a similar pathological process might have occurred.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to correlate clinical findings of anal sphincter defects and function with a sonographic diagnosis of significant sphincter defects.
METHODS: This is an observational cross-sectional study on women seen 6 to 10 weeks after primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs). All patients underwent a standardized interview including the St Mark incontinence score, a digital rectal examination, and 3-/4-dimensional transperineal ultrasound imaging.
RESULTS: Two hundred forty-five patients were seen after primary repair of OASIs. Mean age was 29 (17-43) years. They were assessed at a median of 58 (15-278) days postpartum. One hundred fifty-seven (64%) delivered normal vaginally, 72 (29%) delivered by vacuum, and 16 (7%) delivered by forceps. A comparison of external anal sphincter (EAS) and internal anal sphincter ultrasound volume data and palpation was possible in 220 and 212 cases, respectively. Sphincter defects at rest and on contraction were both detected clinically in 17 patients. Significant abnormalities of the EAS were diagnosed on tomographic ultrasound imaging in 99 cases (45%), and significant abnormalities of the internal anal sphincter were diagnosed in 113 cases (53%). Agreement between digital and sonographic findings of sphincter defect was poor (k = 0.03-0.08). Women with significant EAS defects on ultrasound were found to have a lower resistance to digital insertion (P = 0.018) and maximum anal squeeze (P = 0.009) on a 6-point scale. The difference was however small.
CONCLUSIONS: Digital rectal examination does not seem to be sufficiently sensitive to diagnose residual sphincter defects after primary repair of OASIs. Imaging is required for the evaluation of sphincter anatomy after repair.