Displaying all 5 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Ng PE
    Med J Malaysia, 1993 Jun;48(2):217-21.
    PMID: 8350799
    Emergency left-sided colonic resections have traditionally been dealt with by employing staged resections due to the dangers of an anastomosis in unprepared bowel. A small series of 6 patients with left-sided colonic obstruction is presented in which a single stage primary anastomosis was done after an antegrade intraoperative colonic lavage. There were no deaths, infective complications or anastomotic leaks. Major series in the last decade using intraoperative colonic lavage are reviewed as well, to confirm that the method is safe, effective and warrants wider usage locally.
    Matched MeSH terms: Therapeutic Irrigation/methods*
  2. Chan WK, Azmi N, Mahadeva S, Goh KL
    World J Gastroenterol, 2014 Oct 21;20(39):14488-94.
    PMID: 25339836 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14488
    To compare same-day whole-dose vs split-dose of 2-litre polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) plus bisacodyl for colon cleansing for morning colonoscopy.
    Matched MeSH terms: Therapeutic Irrigation/methods*
  3. Reddy KB, Dash S, Kallepalli S, Vallikanthan S, Chakrapani N, Kalepu V
    J Contemp Dent Pract, 2013 Nov 1;14(6):1028-35.
    PMID: 24858745
    The present study was conducted to compare the cleaning efficacy (debris and smear layer removal) of hand and two NiTi rotary instrumentation systems (K3 and ProTaper).
    Matched MeSH terms: Therapeutic Irrigation/methods
  4. Pui WC, Chieng TH, Siow SL, Nik Abdullah NA, Sagap I
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2020 Oct 01;21(10):2927-2934.
    PMID: 33112550 DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.10.2927
    BACKGROUND: Various methods have been used for treatment of hemorrhagic radiation proctitis (HRP) with variable results. Currently, the preferred treatment is formalin application or endoscopic therapy with argon plasma coagulation. Recently, a novel therapy with colonic water irrigation and oral antibiotics showed promising results and more effective compared to 4% formalin application for HRP. The study objective is to compare the effect of water irrigation and oral antibiotics versus 4% formalin application in improving per rectal bleeding due to HRP and related symptoms such as diarrhoea, tenesmus, stool frequency, stool urgency and endoscopic findings.

    METHODS: We conducted a study on 34 patients with HRP and randomly assigned the patients to two treatment arm groups (n=17). The formalin group underwent 4% formalin dab and another session 4 weeks later. The irrigation group self-administered daily rectal irrigation at home for 8 weeks and consumed oral metronidazole and ciprofloxacin during the first one week. We measured the patients' symptoms and endoscopic findings before and after total of 8 weeks of treatment in both groups.

    RESULTS: Our study showed that HRP patients had reduced per rectal bleeding (p = 0.003) in formalin group, whereas irrigation group showed reduced diarrhoea (p=0.018) and tenesmus (p=0.024) symptoms. The comparison between the two treatment arms showed that irrigation technique was better than formalin technique for tenesmus (p=0.043) symptom only.

    CONCLUSION: This novel treatment showed benefit in treating HRP. It could be a new treatment option which is safe and conveniently self-administered at home or used as a combination with other therapies to improve the treatment outcome for HRP.
    .

    Matched MeSH terms: Therapeutic Irrigation/methods*
  5. Decurcio DA, Rossi-Fedele G, Estrela C, Pulikkotil SJ, Nagendrababu V
    J Endod, 2019 Apr;45(4):387-393.e2.
    PMID: 30833095 DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.01.013
    INTRODUCTION: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess whether machine-assisted agitation resulted in less postoperative pain (PP) compared with syringe irrigation with needle alone in adult patients undergoing root canal treatment.

    METHODS: A literature search was performed in 3 electronic databases for articles published before August 2018. Randomized clinical trials published in English that compared PP between machine-assisted agitation and syringe irrigation with needles as part of nonsurgical root canal treatment were included. Two authors were independently involved in the article selection process, data extraction, and assessment of the quality of included studies using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool. The pooled effect estimates of the standardized mean difference (SMD) between machine-assisted agitation and syringe irrigation with needle was calculated by a random effects-modeled meta-analysis. A subgroup meta-analysis was performed. The quality of evidence was evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach.

    RESULTS: Six studies were included for systematic review. Meta-analysis was performed using 3 studies and showed that machine-assisted agitation resulted in less PP compared with syringe irrigation with needle at 24 hours (SMD = -0.73; 95% confidence interval, -1.04 to -0.42; I2 = 30.6%) and 48 hours (SMD = -0.60; 95% CI, -0.85 to -0.35; I2 = 0%). The quality of evidence by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations for the PP outcomes (24 hours and 48 hours) was graded as "moderate" quality.

    CONCLUSIONS: Machine-assisted agitation reduced PP compared with syringe irrigation with needles in nonsurgical root canal treatment. Future clinical trials are needed to support the result of this review.

    Matched MeSH terms: Therapeutic Irrigation/methods*
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links