AIM: To summarize and rank the effectiveness of clinical interventions using different agents for primary prevention of early childhood caries (ECC).
DESIGN: Two reviewers independently searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library to identify randomized controlled trials with at least 12-month follow-up. The network meta-analysis (NMA) on different agents was based on a random-effects model and frequentist approach. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% CI of the caries increment were calculated in terms of either dmft or dmfs and used in the NMA. Caries incidences at the child level were compared using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CI. The effectiveness of the agents was ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).
RESULTS: After screening 3807 publications and selection, the NMA finally included 33 trials. These trials used either a single or combination of agents such as fluorides, chlorhexidine, casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate, probiotics, xylitol, and triclosan. Compared with control, fluoride foam (FF; SMD -0.69, 95% CI: -1.06, -0.32) and fluoride salt (F salt; SMD -0.66, 95% CI: -1.20, -0.13) were effective in preventing caries increment. Probiotic milk plus low fluoride toothpaste (PMLFTP; OR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.77), FF (OR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.37, 0.63), fluoride varnish (FV; OR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.48, 0.81), and fluoride varnish plus high fluoride toothpaste (FVHFTP; OR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57, 0.93) were effectively preventing caries incidence. According to the SUCRA, FF ranked first in preventing caries increment, whereas PMLFTP ranked first in preventing caries incidence.
CONCLUSION: Fluoride foam, F salt, PMLFTP, FV, and FVHFTP all effectively reduce caries increment or caries incidence in preschool children, but the evidence indicates low degree of certainty. Considering the relatively small number of studies, confidence in the findings, and limitations in the study, clinical practitioners and readers should exercise caution when interpreting the NMA results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomised clinical trial recruited 30 patients on fixed appliances with at least one ICL labially on any maxillary incisor. At debond (baseline), they were allocated to three groups, where twice daily fluoride toothpaste was given: (1) as control; (2) supplemented with daily casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate with fluoride (CPP-ACPF); or (3) supplemented with three-monthly professional applied fluoride varnish (FV). Primary outcome was the OCT backscatter reflectance changes of the ICL, measured as integrated reflectivity (IR). Follow-ups were at three-month intervals up to 12 months. The trial was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04788550).
RESULTS: Analyses included 26 participants (nine control; nine CPP-ACPF; eight FV). There were significant reduction in integrated reflectivity over time. Post hoc comparisons showed reductions were significant up to 150-micron depth at 6-months, and up to 250-micron depth at both 9- and 12-months follow-up compared to baseline. At 12-months, FV had the lowest IR values, followed by CPP-ACPF and control, but the differences between groups were not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: After 12-months observation, use of fluoridated toothpaste alone or supplemented with either fluoride varnish or CPP-ACPF promotes enamel remineralization up to 250-micron depth.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Daily fluoridated toothpaste with regular 3-monthly recall visits from the start of orthodontic retention is recommended for effective control of initial caries lesions. FV and CPP-ACPF supplementation can be considered but their long-term benefits remain inconclusive.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four online databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched using different MeSH terms and Boolean Operators to retrieve the articles (until June 2021), followed by a hand-search of the reference list of the included articles. All full-text, original studies in English that evaluated SDF staining and at least one SDF modification/alternative were included.
RESULTS: Among the assessed studies, nine studies explored the stain-minimization effect of potassium iodide (KI) post-application following SDF treatment. Among these, eight concluded that KI application after SDF treatment significantly reduced tooth staining, while one showed marginal staining following glass ionomer restoration of the SDF-treated dentine. Additionally, one study applied potassium fluoride (KF) and silver nitrate (AgNO3 ) concurrently to mitigate SDF-mediated staining. One study compared SDF staining with polyethylene glycol (PEG)-coated nanoparticles containing sodium fluoride (NaF), and another used nanosilver fluoride (NSF) for staining comparison with SDF.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, the addition of different materials to SDF has proven to be a beneficial strategy for overcoming tooth staining associated with SDF. Future studies are warranted, particularly clinical trials, to validate these findings.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: SDF-mediated tooth staining is a serious concern that limits its clinical use. A review of various strategies to overcome this problem will help clinicians enhance its clinical use and patient acceptance.