We report here a case of a kidney transplant recipient in whom the ureter was initially implanted into the peritoneum. Excessive ultrafiltration volume and reversal of serum vs dialysate creatinine ratio when the patient was recommenced on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis first suggested the diagnosis which was subsequently confirmed by a plain abdominal x-ray demonstrating placement of ureteric stent in the peritoneum. This rare complication was successfully corrected with surgical re-implantation of ureter into the bladder and 5 years later, the patient remains well with good graft function.
Malaysia has a low deceased-donor donation rate and has not embarked on a paired kidney exchange program; therefore, ABO-incompatible and HLA-incompatible transplantation remain the main contributor to the sustainability of the national kidney transplantation (KT) program. There were 26 cases of ABO-incompatible KTs performed from 2011 to 2018 in 3 major transplant centers, namely, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, University Malaya Medical Centre, and Prince Court Medical Centre. We collected perioperative and follow-up data through June 2019. The desensitization protocol varies and is center specific: the localized Japanese protocol and Swedish protocol with a target anti-A/B isoagglutinin titer of 16 or 32 on the day of transplant. The induction and tacrolimus-based maintenance protocol was nearly identical. The median follow-up time was 62.3 months (interquartile range, 37.0-79.7). Fifteen subjects had the highest predesensitization anti-A/B titer of ≥32 (57.7%). The acute cellular rejection and antibody-mediated rejection incidence were 12.5% (3 cases) and 8.3% (2 cases), respectively. Patient, graft, and death-censored graft survival rates were 96.2%, 92.3%, and 96.0%, respectively, 1 year post-living-donor KT (LDKT) and 96.2%, 87.2%, and 90.7%, respectively, 5 years post-LDKT. Our experience shows that ABO-incompatible LDKT using a suitable desensitization technique could be a safe and feasible choice for LDKT even with varied desensitization regimens for recipients with relatively high baseline isoagglutinin titers.
The aim of induction therapy in the management of kidney transplant is to reduce the incidence of acute rejection and delayed graft function after kidney transplant. The agent for induction therapy differs depending on the recipient risks. The regimen can be either polyclonal (rabbit antithymocyte globulin [rATG]) or monoclonal antibody (basiliximab). Basiliximab is commonly used in patients with low immunologic risk. However, to date we know that the use of rATG on T cell depletion is dose dependent and more potent antirejection therapy. Therefore, we would like to look at 1-year graft function of very low-dose rATG in low immunologic risk recipients. All low immunologic risk patients who received low-dose rATG (0.5 mg/kg of body weight daily) during transplant (day 0) and on days 1 and 2 were recruited. Their renal function, HLA donor-specific antibodies, lymphocyte counts, protocol biopsy results, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) polymerase chain reaction were monitored as per clinical practice. All 10 patients had immediate graft function. Low-dose rATG caused lymphocyte counts to deplete immediately on day 0, and the effect lasted about 1 month post-transplant. All the patients had stable graft function without any significance episode of rejection. Only one patient had de novo HLA-DQ antibody. It is good to know that without prophylaxis antiviral in CMV+ donor to CMV+ recipient, the incidence of CMV viremia is considerably low in our cohort. Very low-dose rATG is an effective induction immunosuppression in low immunologic risk patients with acceptable infection risk.
The shortage of deceased donors led to an increase of living related renal transplant performed in the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) or ABO incompatibilities. There are various desensitization protocols that have been proposed. Here, we describe the outcome of these sensitized patients. This is a prospective cohort study recruiting all kidney transplant recipients from August 2016 until June 2018. Deceased donations, ABO incompatible patients, and sensitized patients who were not prescribed on our desensitization protocol were excluded. Recipients were screened for the presence of HLA-antibodies 1 month before transplant. Those with positive DSA will undergo flow cytometry (risk stratification). We are using a protocol that consisted of intravenous rituximab 200 mg (day -14), intravenous antithymocyte globulin 5mg/kg (day 0-4), plasma exchange post transplant for patients with mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) < 3000, and negative flow cytometry. Those patients with MFI ≥ 3000 or positive flow cytometry need extra cycles pretransplant. A total of 40 patients were recruited, and 20 were sensitized patients. Among the sensitized group 4 of 20 had flow cytometry crossmatch positive, while all had preformed HLA-DSA. A total of 8 of 20 had class I HLA-DSA, 11 of 20 had class II HLA-DSA, and 1of 20 was positive for both class I and II HLA-DSA. Mean immunodominant MFI was 2133.4 (standard deviation [SD], 4451.24) and 1383.7 (SD, 2979.02) for class I and class II, respectively. At 1 year, mean serum creatinine was 108.90 (SD, 25.95) and 118.42 (SD, 31.68) in sensitized and unsensitized patients, respectively. One of 20 unsensitized patients had Banff 1B rejection at 3 months, and there was no significant rejection in sensitized patients at 6 months and 1 year. There was no difference in the occurrence of de novo HLA-DSA between the groups. Desensitization protocols may help to overcome incompatibility barriers in living donor renal transplant. The combination of low-dose rituximab, antithymocyte globulin, and judicious use of plasma exchange has worked well for our cohort.