MyMedR

Displaying all 4 publications

Abstract:

Sort:

Meta-analysis of histopathological outcomes of laparoscopic assisted rectal resection (LARR) vs open rectal resection (ORR) for carcinoma

Memon MA, Awaiz A, Yunus RM, Memon B, Khan S

Am J Surg, 2018 11;216(5):1004-1015.
PMID: 29958656 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.06.012

BACKGROUND: We conducted a meta-analysis of the randomized evidence to determine the relative merits of histopathological outcomes of laparoscopic assisted (LARR) versus open rectal resection (ORR) for rectal cancer.
DATA SOURCES: A search of PubMed and other electronic databases comparing LARR and ORR between Jan 2000 and June 2016 was performed. Histopathological variables analyzed included; location of rectal tumors; complete and incomplete TME; positive and negative circumferential resection margins (+/-CRM); positive distal resected margins (+DRM); distance of tumor from DRM; number of lymph nodes harvested; resected specimen length; tumor size and perforated rectum.
RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs totaling 3843 patients (LARR = 2096, ORR = 1747) were analyzed. Comparable effects were noted for all these histopathological variables except for the variable perforated rectum which favored ORR.
CONCLUSIONS: LARR compares favorably to ORR for rectal cancer treatment. However, there is significantly higher risk of rectal perforation during LARR compared to ORR.

Matched MeSH terms: Rectal Neoplasms/surgery*
Chylous ascites after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma: a rare but significant incident

Chan KY, Teoh CM, Sukumar N

Asian J Surg, 2006 Jan;29(1):46-8.
PMID: 16428100

Chylous ascites specifically after anterior resection for rectal cancer has not been documented in the literature thus far. All previously reported postoperative chylous ascites developed in other types of malignancies and were diagnosed within a few days of surgery. However, the patient we report had symptoms 2 years after surgery. Intraoperatively, chylous ascites was found with multiple lymph node metastasis in the small bowel mesentery and retroperitoneal region. The rarity of chylous ascites after anterior resection in rectal carcinoma is documented and discussed.

Matched MeSH terms: Rectal Neoplasms/surgery*
Fulltext Continent pouch ileostomy

Tay SK, Meah FA, Isa MR, Phang KS

Med J Malaysia, 1994 Sep;49(3):310-4.
PMID: 7845289

Continent pouch ileostomy is fashioned for patients who need a proctocolectomy. It is usually indicated for cases of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis where the anal sphincter can no longer maintain normal function or has to be removed. A case of familial adenomatous polyposis with features of Gardner's syndrome is reported. The patient presented with carcinoma of the rectum. Abdominoperineal resection followed by completion pancolectomy was performed. A continent pouch ileostomy was fashioned for him. He resumed work as a labourer within six months. The pouch was troublefree, needed to emptied four to six times a day and was fully continent of fluid, flatus and faeces until his demise three years later from liver secondaries. Continent pouch ileostomy is a better alternative than permanent end ileostomy. All care should be taken to rule out the existence of Crohn's disease. It is proposed that continent pouch ileostomy should be offered to patients needing permanent ileostomy if the expertise is available.

Matched MeSH terms: Rectal Neoplasms/surgery*
A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic-assisted Rectal Resection (LARR) Versus Open Rectal Resection (ORR) for Carcinoma

Memon MA, Yunus RM, Memon B, Awaiz A, Khan S

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2018 Dec;28(6):337-348.
PMID: 30358650 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000589

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the randomized evidence to determine the relative merits of perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted (LARR) versus open rectal resection (ORR) for proven rectal cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of the Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index, Current Contents and PubMed databases identified English-language randomized clinical trials comparing LARR and ORR. The meta-analysis was prepared in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Thirteen outcome variables were analyzed. Random effects meta-analyses were performed due to heterogeneity.
RESULTS: A total of 14 randomized clinical trials that included 3843 rectal resections (LARR 2096, ORR 1747) were analyzed. The summary point estimates favored LARR for the intraoperative blood loss, commencement of oral intake, first bowel movement, and length of hospital stay. There was significantly longer duration of operating time of 38.29 minutes for the LARR group. Other outcome variables such as total complications, postoperative pain, postoperative ileus, abdominal abscesses, postoperative anastomotic leak, reintervention and postoperative mortality rates were found to have comparable outcomes for both cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: LARR was associated with significantly reduced blood loss, quicker resumption of oral intake, earlier return of gastrointestinal function, and shorter length of hospital stay at the expense of significantly longer operating time. Postoperative morbidity and mortality and analgesia requirement for both these groups were comparable. LARR seems to be a safe and effective alternative to ORR; however, it needs to be performed in established colorectal units with experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

Matched MeSH terms: Rectal Neoplasms/surgery*