Displaying all 5 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Chan CYW, Chiu CK, Cheung JPY, Cheung PWH, Gani SMA, Kwan MK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2020 Sep 15;45(18):1285-1292.
    PMID: 32756270 DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003622
    STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.

    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the clinical practices of spine surgeons within the Asia Pacific region.

    SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: COVID-19 pandemic had changed spine surgeons' clinical practices and their concerns toward personal and family risk of infection.

    METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was carried out from May 4, 2020 to June 4, 2020. The questionnaire was administered using REDCAP. The online questionnaire includes four sections. First section includes surgeon's demographics, background, type of clinical practice, and status of pandemic in their country. Second section includes volume and the type of spine surgery practice before the COVID pandemic. Third section includes changes of clinical practice during the pandemic and the last section was regarding their concern on COVID transmission.

    RESULTS: Total of 222 respondents from 19 countries completed the questionnaire. During the pandemic, 92.3% of the respondents felt their clinical practice was affected. 58.5% respondents reported reduced outpatient clinic hours and 74.6% respondents reported reduced operation theatre hours due to the enforcement by the hospital administration. The mean reduction of clinic volume for all countries was 48.1%. There was a significant reduction in the number of surgeries performed in Japan, Malaysia, India, Philippines, and South Korea. This was due to reduced patient load. More than 60% of respondents were worried being infected by COVID-19 virus and >68% were worried of transmission to their family members.

    CONCLUSION: COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected the clinical and surgical practice of spine surgeons in the Asia Pacific region. Clinics were closed or the practice hours reduced. Similarly, surgical theaters were closed, reduced, or limited to semi-emergency and emergency surgeries. Spine surgeons were moderately concerned of contracting COVID-19 during their clinical practice but were extremely concerned to transmit this disease to their family members.

    LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

    Matched MeSH terms: Surgical Procedures, Operative/statistics & numerical data*
  2. Kandasami P, Inbasegaran K, Lim WL
    Med J Malaysia, 2003 Aug;58(3):413-9.
    PMID: 14750382
    This paper examines the surgical pathology associated with perioperative deaths in a country that is undergoing the transition from a developing to a developed nation status. The data from an ongoing nation-wide perioperative mortality study was prospectively collected for the period July 1996 to December 1997 and analyzed. The surgical pathology related to perioperative deaths in Malaysia is different from other developing and developed countries. While death from trauma and the late presentation of surgical conditions are similar to developing countries, infective gastrointestinal conditions were rarely encountered. Diseases associated with advanced age such as colorectal cancer, peptic ulcer, urological diseases and vascular conditions are beginning to emerge. As the country races towards a developed nation status, increasing life expectancy and changing life-styles are expected to influence the disease pattern. The planning of surgical facilities and manpower development must recognize the changes taking place.
    Matched MeSH terms: Surgical Procedures, Operative/statistics & numerical data*
  3. Sanmugam A, Vythilingam G, Singaravel S, Nah SA
    Pediatr Surg Int, 2020 Aug;36(8):925-931.
    PMID: 32594243 DOI: 10.1007/s00383-020-04704-1
    PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has placed an unprecedented test on the delivery and management of healthcare services globally. This study describes the adaptive measures taken and evolving roles of the members of the paediatric surgery division in a developing country during this period.

    METHODS: We adopted multiple adaptive strategies including changes to stratification of surgeries, out-patient services by urgency and hospital alert status, policy writing involving multidisciplinary teams, and redeployment of manpower. Modifications were made to teaching activities and skills training to observe social distancing and mitigate reduced operative learning opportunities. Roles of academic staff were expanded to include non-surgical duties.

    RESULTS: The planned strategies and changes to pre COVID-19 practices were successful in ensuring minimal disruption to the delivery of essential paediatric surgical services and training. Despite the lack of established guidelines and literature outlining strategies to address the impact of this pandemic on surgical services, most of the initial measures employed were consistent with that of other surgical centres.

    CONCLUSION: Changes to delivery of surgical services and surgical training warrant a holistic approach and a constant re-evaluation of practices with emergence of new experiences and guidelines.

    Matched MeSH terms: Surgical Procedures, Operative/statistics & numerical data*
  4. Rigg JR, Jamrozik K, Myles PS, Silbert B, Peyton P, Parsons RW, et al.
    Control Clin Trials, 2000 Jun;21(3):244-56.
    PMID: 10822122
    The Multicenter Australian Study of Epidural Anesthesia and Analgesia in Major Surgery (The MASTER Trial) was designed to evaluate the possible benefit of epidural block in improving outcome in high-risk patients. The trial began in 1995 and is scheduled to reach the planned sample size of 900 during 2001. This paper describes the trial design and presents data comparing 455 patients randomized in 21 institutions in Australia, Hong Kong, and Malaysia, with 237 patients from the same hospitals who were eligible but not randomized. Nine categories of high-risk patients were defined as entry criteria for the trial. Protocols for ethical review, informed consent, randomization, clinical anesthesia and analgesia, and perioperative management were determined following extensive consultation with anesthesiologists throughout Australia. Clinical and research information was collected in participating hospitals by research staff who may not have been blind to allocation. Decisions about the presence or absence of endpoints were made primarily by a computer algorithm, supplemented by blinded clinical experts. Without unblinding the trial, comparison of eligibility criteria and incidence of endpoints between randomized and nonrandomized patients showed only small differences. We conclude that there is no strong evidence of important demographic or clinical differences between randomized and nonrandomized patients eligible for the MASTER Trial. Thus, the trial results are likely to be broadly generalizable.
    Matched MeSH terms: Surgical Procedures, Operative/statistics & numerical data*
  5. Malik AS, Quah BS
    Educ Health (Abingdon), 2003 Jul;16(2):163-75.
    PMID: 14741902
    OBJECTIVE: This paper compares the clinical experience in acute conditions of the undergraduate students of a medical school from a developing country (Malaysia) with those from a developed country (UK).
    METHODS: This study was conducted at the School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM). Through questionnaire survey enquiry was made about 27 acute medical conditions (i.e. conditions related to internal medicine, paediatrics, and psychiatry), 15 acute surgical conditions (i.e. conditions related to general surgery, orthopaedics, ophthalmology, otorhinolaryngology, gynaecology and obstetrics), 15 surgical operations and 26 practical procedures. The results obtained were compared with published data from the UK.
    RESULTS: Acute medical conditions were seen by higher number of the USM students but with less frequency than the British students. The USM students saw practical procedures more frequently than the British students did, but almost an equal number performed these procedures independently. The British students attended surgical operations more frequently than the USM students did.
    CONCLUSION: Given the limitations of comparison (epidemiological, cultural and geographical differences, conventional curriculum (in the British medical schools) vs. problem based learning curriculum (in the Malaysian medical school)) the overall clinical experience of the medical students in the USM and the UK was comparable. The USM students had more opportunities to observe cases and procedures but "hands on" experience was similar to that of the British students.
    Matched MeSH terms: Surgical Procedures, Operative/statistics & numerical data
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator (afdal@afpm.org.my)

External Links